Ward information page: 177 – JP Nagar

If you are a voter from JP Nagar, here's all the information that is relevant to your ward - candidate info, infrastructure details, outstanding bills and more.

177 – JP Nagar

 

Complaints data shows that garbage and roads are the major problems here. More information on the ward follows:

MLA (2013): B N Vijayakumar (BJP), Jaya Nagar
MP (2014): Ananth Kumar (BJP), Bangalore South

BBMP 2010

Corporator: N. Chandrashekar Raju (BJP)
#20/1, 22nd ‘A’ Main, Marenahalli, 2nd stage, J.P Nagar, Bangalore. Ph: 9880185530
Reservation: BC-A

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 28.5
Winner’s margin: 4163
Total votes polled: 11981
Total voters: 27439

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 26776
Male: 13582
Female: 13192
Others: 2

Reserved: General (Women)

Contesting Candidates

BJP: KN Lakshmi Natraj
INC: Asha
JDS: S Leelavati
CPI(M):
Neela Nanjesh

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 28846
  • Households: 7566
  • Area: 1.8 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 1109 km
  • Lakes: Doresanipalaya, Total area: 19.4 sq km
  • Parks: 22, Total area: 5.1 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 5, Total area: 1.7 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

Candidates

No candidates have filled the information collection form so far. If you know anyone contesting, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

Candidate affidavits

BJP: KN Lakshmi Natraj – Click here
INC: Asha – Click here
JDS: S Leelavati – Click here

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:


Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It may not be from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

‘Cash for coverage’ comes to BBMP elections too
BBMP Elections 2015: Special coverage by Citizen Matters
Less educated, but stinking rich: Will this be the new set of BBMP corporators?
BJP manifesto for BBMP election 2015
Congress manifesto for BBMP election 2015
JDS manifesto for BBMP election – 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…