All you need to know about Ward 79 – Sarvagna Nagar

What were the works done in Sarvagna Nagar ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

79 – Sarvagna Nagar

Some of the job codes for this ward have no description of the work to be done. This means the contractor gets paid without anyone having a chance to even know what he did, in the future, forget checking the quality of the work done. Here is more information on Sarvagnanagar ward.

MLA (2013): S Raghu (BJP), C.V. Ramannagar (SC)
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010:

Corporator: G. Bhuvaneshwari (BJP), Reservation:SC
#3208, 6th main road, 13th cross, H.A.L, Indiranagar, Bangalore-38. Ph:9945630799

Votes:
Winner’s percentage: 19
Winner’s margin:619
Total votes for the winner: 13349
Total voters: 33389

BBMP 2015:

Total voters: 32874
Male: 17434
Female: 15420
Others: 20

Reserved: OBC-A (Women)

Contesting Candidates:

BJP: Shashirekha Mukund
INC: Manjula
JDS: Swapna

Demographics

Population (2011): 37291
Voters: 31741
Households: 9052
Area: 3.6sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

Road length: 231 km
Lakes: Kadirena Palya (Binnamangala), Total area:5.9 sq km
Parks: 7, Total area:4 sq km
Playground: 1, Total area:0.1 sq km

Active Citizen groups/RWAs

 

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

Candidates

These are the candidates contesting the BBMP elections- 2015, whose information is available with Citizen Matters. If you do not find a particular candidate on this page, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Comments:

  1. Afsar says:

    Good Morning

    Over all Sarvagna Nagar is in bad shape – no sweepers, no supervisor, no marshals. It goes on for weeks even months before any isuue is noticed or corrected.

    At this rate be sure Sarvagna Nagar ward no. 79 will become a slum.

    Please arrange a walk thru all areas and arrange a thorough cleaning.

    We need action Mr. MLA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…