Govt will use BBMP division as an excuse to delay polls: CAF

If BBMP council doesn't exist, the tools of citizen participation, ie, ward committees and Metropolitan Planning Committee will not function, says CAF.

Bengaluru-based Citizen Action Forum (CAF) has suspected a possible delay of BBMP election due to Palike restructuring process, and said it should be opposed.

Addressing media persons here on Thursday, January 23rd, 2015, CAF Secretary Mahalakshmi Parthasarathy said that the Forum fears that the State government would use restructuring as an excuse to delay the election.

“The BBMP election has to happen in time. Inordinate delay would only hamper the process of forming functional Metropolitan Planning Council and ward committees. The government issued an order on November 19, 2014, mentioning that the restructuring committee report has to be submitted within three months. In contrast, the Committee members have said that it would take a longer time to submit comprehensive report,” she added.

She also demanded that the government delink the election from restructuring process. The delay in election would also end up in giving more power to bureaucrats, curbing the power of councillors who will also be the chairpersons of respective ward committees. More power should be entrusted with the elected representatives than bureaucrats, Mahalakshmi stressed.

‘Restructuring not necessary’

CAF members also opposed the government’s plan to restructure BBMP. Forum member N S Mukund predicted that restructuring will not help in reducing financial burden on the BBMP. It will not result in better governance. “Need of the hour is decentralisation of not just power, but also resources. Decentralisation is a better way to improvise governance than restructuring. Departments like BWSSB, electricity, transport should be brought under local governance to generate additional revenue,” he urged.

He said measures like mandated devolution of funds to BBMP independent of the State government, formation of area sabha, ward committees and MPC as per provisions of the 74th amendment would contribute to better governance of the city.

CAF President Rajshekhar D S asked the government to issue a white paper on reasons for the governance deficit and a clear road map for ensuring effective governance for Bengaluru.

He also expressed concern over division of BBMP, resulting in decreasing the power of municipal elected representatives and bureaucrats becoming more powerful. “This will obviously incur more expenses specially at a time when BBMP is already reeling under financial deficit,” he added.

CAF also questioned as to why the restructuring committee has made no mention of MPC. The Forum has written a letter to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah explaining their apprehensions and seeking answers to their questions.

Related Articles

BBMP should be split: D Venkatesh Murthy
Panel invites your suggestions on dividing Bengaluru
BBMP division to be finalised by June 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…