Stop borewell surcharge, remove RWH deadline

Residents object BWSSB collecting borewell surcharge and the plans to stop supply of drinking water for non-compliance of RWH rules.

Residents of 4th Block and 5th Block Jayanagar, Bangalore have written to Dr V S Acharya, Minister for Higher Education, and S Suresh Kumar, Minister for BWSSB on their problems with BWSSB’s rules on Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) and the deadline of December 31st. They write:
 
Dear Sir,
We would like to bring the following facts to your notice, and request that you use your good offices to safeguard the interests of the general public of Bangalore City.

As we all know, Bangalore Development Authority has obtained the legislative sanction to allot sites to all residents of Bangalore who have paid the value in full. The clause in the agreement has specifically stated the schedule of the property as follows:-
‘All the piece and parcel of site, together with all rights, appurtenances whatsoever, whether underneath or above the surface.’

1.    This means that all elemental forces like earth, water, air and sunlight are part of the property owned by the purchaser. If BWSSB wants to control over the water part of this property, they should necessarily obtain the sanction through the state legislature. But, they have transgressed their limits and gone ahead collecting surcharge from residents who have spent their money to construct the bore-wells and also paid for installation of the pumps. We now have the right to challenge this and demand return of this surcharge money to us.

2.    If ground water within the limits of our site is allowed to be taxed as surcharge every month, the day will not be far off if the earth, air and sunlight may also be taxed. We may be asked to pay ‘surcharge’ for growing plants like coconut trees, flowers and vegetables within the limit of our site.

3.    RAIN WATER HARVEST SCHEME
This anarchical state of affairs regarding Rainwater Harvesting by threatening the residents to disconnect the supply of drinking water can never be allowed to have its sway by any law-abiding citizen who has been paying property tax to the BBMP. Time is ripe for all citizens to cry halt to this authoritarian demand by the BWSSB who have no legislative sanction to take away our right to live. Will the government respond to our objection to stop supply of drinking water as announced by the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board? Please accede our request that Rainwater Harvesting should not be made mandatory and see to it that there is no disconnection of drinking water.

4.    Several hundred natural water tanks in and around Bangalore city have been destroyed and the space converted into building sites. Government has thousands of crores of rupees as profits by sales of these sites and hence is largely responsible for the ground water level being diminished to a great extent.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Uthandi’s ₹91-crore ‘flood drain’: Is Chennai solving one problem by creating another?

The WRD's flood fix puts Uthandi at risk. Residents flag pollution, CRZ violations, aquifer damage, and threats to nearby fishing livelihoods.

The Straight-cut Flood Escape Channel project at Uthandi in the southern part of Chennai along East Coast Road was conceived by the Water Resources Department (WRD) as a flood mitigation measure, with a budget of ₹91 crores. The plan proposes a cut-and-cover drain through the VGP Layout in Uthandi, to connect the Buckingham Canal to the Bay of Bengal. The drain is supposedly meant to divert excess floodwater in Buckingham Canal during heavy rains, when areas around the Pallikaranai marsh and Okkiyam Madavu face flooding.  Work on the project started immediately after its inauguration in August 2025. However, residents of…

Similar Story

CIDCO’s new flamingo study raises questions on Navi Mumbai airport safety, wetland future

The Bombay Natural History Society had earlier pointed out that protecting wetlands and ensuring aviation safety should go hand in hand.

The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO)'s decision to appoint Australian aviation consultancy Avisure to study bird movement around the Navi Mumbai International Airport has raised fresh questions about the future of Navi Mumbai's wetlands. The agency has cited the ongoing study as grounds to defer legal protection for DPS Flamingo Lake, arguing that no irreversible decision should be taken until the assessment of bird-related aviation risks is complete. But bird movement around the airport is not being studied for the first time. Findings of BNHS More than a decade ago, the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) was…