L K Advani says saaku to Karnataka IAC, declines meeting

There is much talk about former BJP chief minister B S Yeddyurappa's group snubbing BJP leader L K Advani in Bangalore yesterday. It is now Karnataka IAC's turn to say they are miffed by Advani.

The media is abuzz with reports of jailed Chief Minister Yeddyurappa’s group snubbing national BJP leader L K Advani in Bangalore yesterday by boycotting his anti-corruption rally. It appears the BJP’s political roundabout of contradictions and snubbing has also broadened into civil society anti-corruption movement.

Advani declined to meet Karnataka’s India Against Corruption group, who had lined up a series of demands for him. It appears the senior BJP leader, whose national anti-corruption campaign is widely seen as a way to upstage the UPA, is doing a tightrope walk in Karnataka. The state has been plagued with its own series of scams, and jailed BJP politicians, including Yeddyurappa and the father-and-son duo of Katta Subramanya Naidu and Jagdish Naidu.

"IAC Karnataka was deeply surprised to hear, after numerous attempts made, that Shri L K Advani was unable or unwilling to meet with them and address the key issues surrounding corruption in the State of Karnataka, led by a government from his own party", said an IAC press statement issued on October 31st, the same day Advani was in Bangalore for his rally.

IAC line of up demands for Advani included the following: Karnataka Lokayukta’s reports on the Bellary mining scam and misappropriations in the public distribution system must be implemented. All the MLAs, corporators chargesheeted by the Lokayukta or high court must resign. They must not re-contest unless they are proven innocent. IAC pointed out that Advani himself had resigned from his post when he was one of the chargesheeted in the infamous Hawala case. He contested only after he was acquitted. IAC also wants BJP to support the Jan Lokpal bill. This was reported in the Times of India on October 31st.

In not meeting Bangalore’s IAC group, which ironically includes retired Justice Santosh Hegde, Advani appears to be indicating that his rally is more typically centred on party politics. IAC disagrees. "Does Shri Advani understand that by not acting on the PDS report, the state government is directly affecting lakhs of needy people in the state every single day? Under these circumstances, by ignoring the issues raised by IAC Karnataka an opportunity has been lost to make a new beginning and clean up the situation in Karnataka", states the release.

Karnataka’s IAC group, comprising of largely Bangalore-based volunteers, has a unique history. They initiated the Saaku campaign last year that anchored the groundswell of citizen support for former Justice Santosh Hegde when his interim report on mining came out. The campaign, particularly in Bangalore, strengthened Hegde’s hands (who first offered to resign on the government intransigence). Instead, Hegde then went on to finish his report into both the Bellary mining scam and a host of other land scams which eventually led to Yeddyurappa and others being indicted recently. ⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…