High Court lashes out at BDA, BBMP

The BTM 1st Stage land grab scam is closer to getting resolved. A 2 acre-31 guntas chunk of land has to become a park come what may, ruled the High Court.

In the land grab case filed by BTM Layout’s Bank Officers’ Co- Operative Housing Society(BOCOH) the High Court has ordered civic bodies for taking action against erring officials. The dispute over the ownership of a civic amenity site in BTM layout 1st Stage, measuring 2 acres 31 guntas seems to be fixed for now.

At a hearing on April 20th, HC confirmed in an order that this land was earmarked to be developed as a park by the BDA, or later by BBMP. The court criticised BBMP for the khata transfer of the civic amenity site, and BDA for giving NOC to a private party.  

View of the disputed land from across the street. File pic: Deepthi M S.

In 1982 BOCOH was allotted a total of 30 acres on lease agreement. Around 2 acres and 31 guntas was left out from construction works, meant for a civic amenity site. In May 2005, the society gave this amount of land to maintain it as a park but the BDA officials gave NOC  to a private party just after 6 months. This led BOCOH to file a writ petition.

Justice D V Shylendra kumar was also critical of the BDA. The BDA had justified inaction on grounds that there are proceedings before civil courts and therefore their hands are tied. These were “excuses for inaction”, said Justice Kumar.

The court also ordered BBMP to check the irregularity of transfer of khata in favour of Channappa. BBMP’s excuse that Channappa’s name was in revenue records and that BDA had issued NOC, cannot justify its inaction, court said.

On an ending note, the court ordered both BBMP and BDA to take corrective steps and the developments be placed before the court on next hearing date, on 15th June.

RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

BTM Society fights back, stops land grab
Beware, the BDA fuels land grabbing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…