Near Whitefield, Panchayat and BDA in tax tussle

Residents of five private layouts near Whitefield are running between Panchayat and BDA to get their khatas. Both want collect property taxes from homeowners!

Five private layouts that were approved by the BDA in Bangalore East, Sheegehalli panchayat near Whitefield, are in a quandary on whom to collect Khatas from. The layouts do not fall under BBMP limits and both panchayat and BDA insist that they have the right to collect taxes from the residents.

BDA’s go-ahead

The authorisation letter says that BDA had transferred all its layouts to BBMP in October 2007 as per a Government Order on May 5, 2007; but since some layouts did not come under BBMP, BDA will collect taxes from these property owners, for the owners’ convenience.

It also says that the properties will be handed over to the panchayat when µthe government issues an order for it. Before 2007, BDA had been collecting taxes from layouts. The letter says that BDA can collect taxes accounted from 2007.

Around November, last year BDA (East) Revenue Officer (RO) started sending notices to the layouts requesting tax payment. The notice referred to an authorization letter dated 26 August 2010 signed by the BDA Chairman, Commissioner and Secretary, empowering the Revenue offices to collect taxes from BDA layouts that fall outside BBMP limits.

But last December, the panchayat officials shot off a letter to the residents saying that the claims made by the BDA officer is false, and that panchayat can collect taxes as per the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act 1993. The letter also says that in case of default of payment, the panchayat can stop registration of properties and withdraw the non-objection certificate given for electricity connection. The letter was signed by Panchayat Development Officer Amrish Kumar and Panchayat President Savitha K.

Redstone Akshaya layout (gated) is one of the five BDA approved private layouts in Sheegehalli. Pic: Navya P K

The residents are in a fix as to whom they should pay taxes to. Raghavendra Rao, President of the owners’ association at the BDA-approved Chaithanya Samparpan layout, says that they have not paid taxes yet, owing to the confusion. The layout was formed in 2004 and residents moved in 2007. "We have been meeting BDA officials for over a year to get khatas, they had said that our layout does not come under their jurisdiction. Panchayat was open to collecting taxes then, but the khata rates they fixed were very high compared to BDA rates – they demanded around Rs 10,000 per person. They were also open to negotiation, which means that the rates were not fixed," he says.

Sheegehalli Panchayat Development Officer Amrish Kumar says that according to Panchayat Raj Act, a maximum of 1% of the property value can be charged for transfer of khatas to residents. BBMP charges much lesser – it levies 2% of the stamp duty paid during sale, plus additional charges not higher than Rs 200.

BDA on the other hand isn’t sure if khatas issued by the Panchayath is even valid. B V Ramalingaiah, BDA (East) RO, says, "Panchayatas are not authorised to collect taxes. We cannot say if their khatas would be valid. We have served notices to more than 500 houses in these layouts, residents are yet to submit the tax forms."

Raghavendra Rao says that some residents are ready to collect khatas from panchayats when they have to sell their property. T Ramesh, former owner of a site at Chaithanya Samarpan, says that he had paid property taxes and got khatas from the panchayat during the sale of his property about 6 months back.

"The Registrar at KR Puram said that I had to get khata from the panchayat office to register the sale. I paid the exact amounts as prescribed by panchayat officials – both for property tax and for khata." Ramesh says that he was not even aware of the possibility of getting a BDA khata.  Raghu Mariyappan, who bought the site from Ramesh, also says that he is not aware of BDA issuing khatas. "I have been trying to get my khata from the panchayat after the sale," he says.

Sheegehalli panchayat office has already collected taxes from some residents in BDA approved layouts. Pic: Navya P K

 

Both BDA and panchayat officials say that they need to collect taxes for developmental works. Panchayat President Savitha, who had co-signed the letter asking residents to pay up, however is not sure of her reasons for doing so. She instead pointed to her husband for explanation. "BDA sent a letter to residents, so we also sent a letter. About the reason for demanding taxes, you can ask my husband, his opinion is my opinion," Savitha said. Savitha’s husband Suresh Babu, handing over a copy of the letter at the panchayat office to Citizen Matters, clarified that apartment complexes are the main sources of revenue for the panchayat. "We need this revenue to undertake works in the panchayat. We fix the tax rates accordingly," he says.

Tax rates for panchayat and BDA differ

Panchayat rate
45 paise per sq ft (vacant land)
Rs 1.50 per sq ft (apartments)
Rs 3 per sq ft (villas/homes)

BDA’s tax rates
(Same as BBMP’s lowest, F zone)
20 paise per sq ft (vacant)
Rs 1.20 per sq ft (apartments and villas)

State Advocate-General Ashok Harenahalli says that BDA is entitled to collect taxes from layouts approved by it, as per BDA Act, 1976. "Developmental works inside the layout is also BDA’s responsibility. Usually BDA layouts are transferred to BBMP and not to panchayat, so until BBMP extends its limits to include the village or the layouts are specifically handed over to BBMP, BDA has authority over them. But BDA does accept panchayat khatas as valid," he says.

In other BDA divisions, the ROs say that taxes are being collected from private layouts, without any opposition. Dhanalakshmi, RO for West division, says that there are eight layouts – Sir M Visveswaraya layout block 1 to 8 near Kengeri – under panchayat area, in her division. "We started collecting taxes from them after the 2010 authorization. Residents have been paying taxes accounting from 2007. I don’t know about any opposition from the panchayat." Same situation prevails in South and North divisions too.

Comments:

  1. Murari Agarwal says:

    Is the issue resolved? Many more layouts are upcoming in the vicinity who have to take Khata. It will be helpful if current status is posted.

  2. Navya P K says:

    ‘@Murari Agarwal: The issue has not been resolved yet. Both BDA and Panchayat officials expect residents to pay up, but residents are waiting for some clarity from these agencies.

  3. Rakesh Sharma says:

    Is this issue resolved now ? If BBMP has any plan to include sheegehalli village in its limits in near future

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Children in North Chennai keep local democracy alive through Bala Sabhas

Child councillors push for change in Chennai by bringing attention to crucial issues like drug addiction.

“A democracy masterclass is brewing in North Chennai, where children are showing the way for the 200 ward councillors of the Greater Chennai Corporation,” says Charu Govindan, Founder and Convener at Voice of People. For around six years, her collective has advocated for Area Sabhas, which many councillors conveniently skip to avoid meeting the residents.  But Bala Sabhas, led by child councillors in North Chennai for over a year, are pushing for real change. They have prompted the installation of new street lights and barbed wire fencing at a local GCC school in Tondiarpet, for example.  What is a Bala…

Similar Story

Comprehensive plan in place to minimise environmental impact of Namma Metro construction: BMRCL

Following Citizen Matters' article on Namma Metro construction and its effects on air quality, BMRCL responds.

At Citizen Matters, we recently published an article by our reporter Gangadharan B, addressing the increased dust pollution caused by Namma Metro construction in Bengaluru. The report explored how certain mitigation measures are not being followed at Namma Metro construction sites, affecting air quality and taking a toll on public health. The report also raised questions on whether the air quality in the construction sites is monitored regularly as per the suggestions of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report. While multiple attempts were made to reach out to Bengaluru Metro Rail Construction Limited (BMRCL) before publishing the article, we did…