150 words and no more

The Karnataka government’s new rule on word-limiting RTI applications will increase paperwork, pending cases and appeals, argue activists.

Access to information using the RTI Act may have changed for the worse. The Government of Karnataka under Governor Rameshwar Thakur’s administration has added a new rule, #14, which places a restriction on the subjects and the number of words to be contained in an application asking for information under the RTI Act.

The rule was in the form of amendment (GO) to RTI rules 2005 and signed by the Under Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms on behalf of President of India and published in the Gazette of GOK. It is now in force.

The rule allows only one topic per application (even if they are inter-related) and restricts the description to 150 words. To understand the impact of this rule, you have to understand how a RTI application moved before this rule was introduced:

How the RTI process works

If a citizen comes across any civic issue/problem related to roads, drainage and other utilities, then he files a single RTI application with the BBMP/ or the appropriate government agency asking for information related to all the issues.

In a large number of applications, the reply given by the BBMP so far has been either vague in nature or misleading. At this stage, some RTI applicants lose their enthusiasm. The brave ones continue their fight and appeal to the Appellate Authority or to the Karnataka Information Commission, where the SCIC (State Chief Information Commissioner) presides.

There is a whopping time lag in taking up these appeals – this delay averages to about 4 months. By this time, most of the officials who had given the original vague/misleading information are transferred and there’s a new official in place now, and he knows nothing about the RTI application or the information provided. The new official asks for time and the SCIC adjourns the case for another 4 months!

After a gap of 9 months from the date of filing the original application, the SCIC then directs the official in charge to give the information.

So, in effect, the RTI applicant gets his information 10 months after filing his first application. In between he has to do several desperate rounds to the concerned government agency and the KIC, following up his case.

Despite all these roadblocks and potholes, some dedicated RTI activists have still managed to get their hands on critical information and bring the guilty to book.

How the new rule obstructs

A citizen has to be sparse with his details. If he is not a good writer and cannot edit the number of words to 150 – too bad, his application will be rejected. Alternatively, he may not be able to explain his query within 150 words – this will give rise to more misleading replies. If he attaches documents with his application, then the PIOs may count the number of words in his attachment and reject the application!

Citizens argue that this is a not progressive rule. Already, as things stand, government departments delay all applications. With this, the number of applications pending with departments could rise even further and so will the number of appeals before the SCIC, all adding up to further delays and a humungous mass of paperwork.

As of now, the present SCIC does not even have a record of cases pending, officials punished, etc., but what is for certain is that a very large number of (an ‘ocean’ say some) pending. The introduction of Rule 14 will not reduce the number of cases, say RTI activists.

The RTI Act in its present form has quite a few loopholes because of which many cases are stuck. It needs to be made more robust and free of loopholes. Instead of making the RTI act work for the people, the Karnataka government decided to add Rule 14. Rule 14 raises the prospect that some government officers will now view applications based on their word count and the summary rather than on their merit, say activists.

A group of RTI activists have already written to Karnataka’s Governor, requesting him to revisit the section and eliminate it. Action though will rest with the new government that comes to power soon after the current elections.


  1. Legal Techie says:

    Very true.
    That is why this campaign is launched:

    Everyone in the state should participate to protect the only right we citizens have ‘Practically’.

  2. B.V.Malde says:

    Why no body challenged the Karnataka’s restriction to RTI query to 150 words?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Mumbai Buzz: TapTap wristbands for Metro passengers | Double property tax without Marathi signboards… and more

In other news in Mumbai: Unaided school teachers on election duty; Coastal Road to be connected to Sea Link; Underpass on Coastal Road submerged.

TapTap wristbands for metro passengers Passengers on the Metro 1 line, which runs from Ghatkopar to Versova, will have a new ticketing option in the near future. Mumbai Metro One Pvt Ltd (MMOPL) has introduced a QR-coded wristband dubbed TapTap.  Passengers will be able to tap their wristbands at the automated fare collection gate (AFC). With an inaugural price of Rs 200, these wearable metro tickets are available at all customer care windows on the metro line. According to MMOPL, the TapTap wristbands are made of a silicone based material that is non-allergenic. They are water-proof and operate without a battery.…

Similar Story

Chennai Buzz: Road repairs affected by election | Membership increases in Anna Library… and more

In other news from Chennai: Residents of Kannappar Thidal boycott Lok Sabha polls; Semmenchery residents to get piped water supply

Kannappar Thidal residents of Chennai Central constituency to boycott Lok Sabha elections In line with the villagers of Ennore and Parandur, residents of Kannappar Thidal in Chennai's Central constituency have also decided to boycott the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. Around 62 families, who were living on the streets near the Ripon building, were evicted in 2002 by the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) as their presence was found to be an obstacle to the then-ongoing sporting events and developmental work in the nearby Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium. These families were provided with a temporary shelter with a promise of alternative housing in…