How High Court is curbing mindless tree felling in Bengaluru

Responding to a PIL, Karnataka High Court has given many orders to reduce tree felling in Bengaluru. Now citizens have greater say in decisions on tree felling as well.

In 2018, the NGO Bangalore Environment Trust (BET) filed a PIL (WP 17841 of 2018) in the High Court of Karnataka, considering the city’s deteriorating green cover. The PIL sought to implement the provisions of the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act 1976 (‘Trees Act’). This article is a brief summary of the current status of the PIL.

The petitioners’ prayers to the court were as follows:

  • The Tree authority and the Tree Officer should do their duties diligently as per Tree Act.
  • A comprehensive Tree Census should be carried out.
  • A public notice should be issued when the Tree Officer gets an application to fell trees.
  • Objections from public should be considered before issuing permission to cut trees.
  • All efforts, including transplantation, should be made to save trees.
  • Notification of all provisions of the Tree Act to all parts of Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural (besides BBMP limits).
  • Authorities should plant and maintain a standard number of trees (for example, through adequate compensatory plantation).
  • Challenging the scope of Section 8(7) of the Tree Act which provides for certain trees being exempted.

Court passed key orders

The court has so far passed orders/ made observations regarding the following issues:

Permission for tree felling

Under the Trees Act, the Tree Officer has the authority to issue permissions to fell trees. In April 2019, to address the continued non-compliance under the Act, the Honourable Court asked the government to form a Tree Expert Committee (TEC). Since then, all applications are placed before the TEC which evaluates whether trees can be saved by adopting any method (such as transplantation) and permits felling only as a last resort, after exhausting all other options. The TEC, which comprises experts in the field of agriculture and forestry, has been able to save several trees either through retention or transplantation.

Tree Census

The court expressed utmost dissatisfaction that the tree census (which is mandated under the Trees Act) had not been carried out nearly 43 years since the Act came into force. In February 2020, the court considered initiating contempt proceedings against the concerned authorities. However, the authorities then started the tree census; up till December 2020, about 46,000 trees were enumerated. Census details have been uploaded on the BBMP website. A mobile app is being developed with features such as geo-tagging, which would also allow the public to contribute to the survey by entering details of trees in their own properties. Citizens should look out for public notices inviting them to participate in the census.


Read More: Saving trees by transplanting: BMRCL’s approach has some lessons for Bengaluru


Application of mind by TEC

The TEC was expected to demonstrate application of mind while making its decisions. But, in its order dated June 10, 2020, the court observed that the committee members had done the job very casually, and had not displayed any application of mind regarding the chances of survival of trees that were proposed to be transplanted. So, the court directed the government to reconstitute the members of the committee and involve more experts from the field. The new TEC included more experts, who have devised and followed a more rigorous process to save trees through retention/transplantation.

Transplantation of trees

The court observed that transplantation or translocation of trees (so as to protect them from felling) is a fairly expensive method. It noted that the survival of such trees is not guaranteed if sufficient care is not taken at all stages. Striking a note of caution, the court said transplantation is pursued only when there is no alternative but to remove the tree altogether from its original place. The court also noted that it is the duty of the Tree Officer to ensure the transplanted trees survive.

Through the intervention of the court, a detailed scientific procedure was evolved for transplantation by the University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, along with the TEC. This would ensure that trees are transplanted at the appropriate places and care is taken to ensure their survival and growth.

Sarjapura Residents Welfare Association crowd funded to translocate 3 trees which were scheduled for felling due to road widening
File pic of a tree transplantation along Sarjapura Road.

Transparency and public participation

Despite provisions in the Tree Act, there was no transparency about tree-felling activities in the city. Citizens would come to know about felling at the last minute and had no opportunity to raise any objection. As a result of the court’s orders in addressing this issue, the process is gradually becoming more open and transparent. Following are some of the measures being implemented currently to ensure transparency:

  • Whenever BBMP or Forest department gets an application (for tree felling) from any person/entity/organisation, they should upload the application on the BBMP website along with a public notice.
  • Citizens are usually given 10 days to submit their objections to the concerned authority.
  • Objections are noted by the Tree Officer, and are thereafter placed before the TEC which carefully examines the application.
  • TEC will visit the site and inspect if the trees need to be felled or if they can be retained/transplanted. TEC will then prepare a report with its recommendations and submit it to the Tree Officer.
  • Based on these recommendations, the Tree Officer will issue tree-felling permissions.
  • All permissions issued by the Tree Officer (irrespective of the number of trees) have to be uploaded on the BBMP website.
  • All plans for compensatory plantation (in the ratio of 1:10) should be uploaded on the BBMP website. The concerned authority can act upon the tree-felling permission only after they submit the compensatory plans to the Tree Officer, and the plans are uploaded on the Forest Department website.
  • Periodic reports should be submitted on the survivability of the transplanted trees, and these reports should be uploaded on the Forest Department website.

Felling activities in the city can be undertaken only after the process described above has been adhered to. Hence, citizens should regularly check documents uploaded on the BBMP website, and participate in filing objections against tree felling.


Read More: Why you don’t have a say in tree felling in Bengaluru


Question of exempted trees

BMRCL had stated that as per Section 8(7) of the Trees Act, a person/entity does not need permission to fell certain kinds of trees. BMRCL had sought to cut 872 trees without any permission. The petitioners submitted detailed objections on how this interpretation is inaccurate, particularly considering the established environmental jurisprudence.

The court held that the precautionary principle, along with the principles of public trust and sustainable development, are applicable to public authorities such as BMRCL, and an attempt must be made to save as many trees as possible. BMRCL accordingly undertook to refer to these 872 trees to the TEC. And the TEC noted that 32 trees were not even exempted species under the Trees Act.

BMRCL has thereafter undertaken to refer all applications to the TEC, irrespective of whether the trees are in the exempted category or not.

Key observations of the court

From time to time, the court has made significant observations, such as:

  • Even if one tree is permitted to be felled, it has very serious consequences. It is lost permanently, and its replacement is not possible in the near future.
  • Under the doctrine of public trust, it is the duty of the State and public authorities to take all possible steps to protect the environment.
  • According to the well-recognised principle of sustainable development and precautionary principle, it is necessary for the authorities to apply their mind to the question of saving the maximum number of trees while carrying out a development project.
  • All citizens have the right to clean air under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950.
  • As far tree felling is concerned, irrespective of the applicability of the Trees Act, the state government and its agencies should not act on their own but will have to take the assistance of experts in the field.
  • It is the duty of the Tree Officer to frequently visit the location of transplanted trees to ascertain whether the agency appointed by BMRCL is taking proper care of the transplanted trees during the contractual period of 3 years. After the expiry of three years (once BMRCL’s contract with the tree-transplanting entity expires), the Tree Officer shall verify the condition of the transplanted trees and issue a direction to BMRCL to take care of these trees even after, if required.

The High Court’s progressive orders in the last two years seem to be a good start in preserving the city’s greenery. Various stakeholders can now leverage this strong legal foundation to help restore Bengaluru as a garden city.

[This article was originally published at bngenvtrust.org and has been republished with minor edits]

Also Read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Study shows TNPCB ill-equipped to monitor the environmental impact of pollution

The scientific team of TNPCB is working at half its strength, affecting the Board's ability to carry out inspections in Chennai and other parts of the State.

The Central Pollution Control Board and the State Pollution Control Boards are the primary custodians for preventing and controlling all forms of pollution in our country. Despite their significant role in environmental protection, the public is mostly unaware of the functions of these regulatory bodies, due to insufficient research. Therefore, we at Citizen consumer & civic Action Group (CAG) have attempted to understand the functions of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), through a study titled โ€˜The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board in Retrospect: An Examination of Selected Parameters from 2017 to 2022.โ€™ Read more: Fisherfolk lament as environmental…

Similar Story

Why the national programme for clean air failed a gasping Mumbai

Mumbai has seen an alarming decline in air quality. A look at the limited impact of the National Clean Air Programme on mitigating pollution.

October 2023 was a shocker for Mumbai. The coastal city has historically recorded lower AQI levels as compared to Delhi, which is notorious for its poor air quality. But the tables turned in October 2023, with AQI in Mumbai reaching dangerously high levels of up to 300, surpassing Delhi for several days. This led to a slew of respiratory ailments, more so among the vulnerable populations. PM2.5 levels have, in fact, seen a consistent increase in Mumbai over the past three years. Dr Jui Mandke, a paediatric surgeon practising in Mumbai, says, โ€œIn October 2023, we encountered the maximum number…