In world’s most populous democracy, citizen concerns struggle to reach Parliament

What would citizens have wanted the special session of Parliament to discuss? Findings from an online poll raises important questions.

An early adoption of universal adult franchise and a parliamentary system that has stood the test of time have ensured that every eligible Indian voter has a stake in national policies through their elected representatives.

During the recently concluded G20 summit, India positioned herself as the ‘mother of democracy’ – patting herself on the back as a model of pluralism and participation.

This claim however calls for some critical self-examination.

Parliament functions not only as a space for deliberating and dissecting provisions of imminent laws. It is also the main institution seeking accountability for government actions and inactions. To this end, its functions merit continuous public scrutiny and discussion.

Functioning of parliament

Typically, three parliamentary sessions are held each year – Monsoon, Winter and Budget sessions. The 2023 Monsoon session of parliament concluded on August 11th and the winter session will start in mid-December.

A special session of parliament is one in which MPs gather to either conduct matters requiring urgent deliberation or to commemorate a nationally important event. In the past, special sessions have been held in 1947, 1962, 1972, 1992, 1997 and 2017.

In a decision that aroused much consternation, the union government on August 31st announced a special session of parliament from September 18th to September 22nd. But no agenda was mentioned then.

On September 13th, under much public pressure, the government announced a tentative and non-exclusive agenda which included a discussion on Parliament’s journey of 75 years and the move to the new parliament building built by the present government. The old one, where the session began, was named Samvidhan Sabha.

The following was the legislation agenda:

1. Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill that seeks to replace the Chief Justice of India with a cabinet minister in the panel for selection of the chief election commissioner and election commissioners

2. The Repealing and Amending Bill, 2023.

3. The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2023.

4. The Press and Registration of Periodicals Bill, 2023.

In recent years, many key laws and policies were decided with hardly any consultative processes and democratic deliberation. From demonetisation to the recently enacted Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, one observes a near absence of discussion and parliamentary debate.

In the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-14), 71% of the bills were referred to parliamentary committees. This decreased to 25% in the 16th Lok Sabha (2014-19) and to less than 10% in the current Lok Sabha. In the 2023 Monsoon session, Parliament passed 20 bills with less than an hour of discussion. Suspension of Question Hour and Zero Hour in the special session thus heightened people’s concerns.

A glimpse of the new Parliament Building in New Delhi
Initial glimpse of the new Parliament Building. The special session also marked the move to the new Parliament building. Pic courtesy: Press Information Bureau

Bahutva Karnataka people’s poll

Pursuant to the announcement of the special session, Bahutva Karnataka, a Karnataka based collective engaged in fostering constitutional values, decided to do a rapid online poll to get a pulse on the kind of issues citizens felt should be included in the Special Session.

The idea was to engage citizens in the democratic process. The poll was conducted from September 12th to 15th and asked citizens to imagine a ‘Parliament Session as if citizens mattered’.

The poll got 232 responses from 19 states with 60% of the respondents from Karnataka and Maharashtra. Though not statistically representative, the results provide a window into what citizens think should be high priority to their government. Each respondent could choose three issues that they thought were the most pressing.

  1. Around 75% of respondents picked ‘Continued Violence in Manipur’ as the matter requiring the most urgent discussion in the special session.
  2. Around 38% of the respondents said that ‘Rising vigilante attacks and bulldozing of homes in violation of law’ needed discussion
  3. Nearly one-third of the respondents said that ‘Inflation and rising costs of essential commodities’ needed to be discussed in the special session.

Predictably, none of the issues selected by citizens in the Bahutva Karnataka were taken up. Also, the five bills originally listed for consideration were not taken up. Instead, only one Bill, the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023, popularly known as the Women’s Reservation Bill which was not part of the originally listed agenda, was introduced and passed on September 21st.


Read more: Women’s Reservation Bill: A long, bumpy road ahead to implementation


The need to be consulted and heard

This manner in which the recent Special Session was planned and conducted lends itself to much speculation on the real reason behind calling the session.

It is a matter of concern that parliamentary proceedings are focussed less on high priority issues faced by the nation and concerning the people and more on electoral politics and political agendas. This divergence between parliament and people’s perceptions of issues of priority is undermining people’s confidence in the government.

Note: The authors would like to acknowledge that the work on the survey and analysis was initiated and led by Bahutva Karnataka. They thank Shaheen Shasa for anchoring the entire effort, and Sakina Dhorajiwala and Naveen Gajjalagiri for their timely help with some data work.

Also read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…