No water for peripheral areas of Bangalore: Gaurav Gupta

The mindless planning of infrastructure in Bangalore has led to depletion and contamination of ground water. Bangalore is already drawing 140 MLD water from Cauvery, while the actual limit is 90 TMC.

BWSSB Chairman Gaurav Das Gupta declared that the peripheral areas of Bengaluru do not and will not have water for the upcoming years.

Gaurav Gupta was taken on by veteran bureaucrat, former additional chief secretary of Government of Karnataka, V Balasubramanian, in the discussion ­The Critical water situation in Bangalore- The way forward conducted by Bangalore International Centreat Domlur.

Both of them discussed the alarming water crisis in Bangalore and its consumption. It was moderated by former chief justice of India M N Venkatachalaiah.

In the wake of acute water crisis, BWSSB Chief told the gathering: “If you are taking a property in Bengaluru, especially in the peripheral areas, take at your own risk! We really don’t have water for those areas.”

He said, plans are there to provide water for the areas in the peripheral of Yelahanka, K R Puram, Kengeri etc. But beyond that the BWSSB cannot supply water.

Former chief justice of India M N Venkatachalaiah modrating the panel discussion headed by BWSSB Chairman Gaurav Gupta and former additional chief secretary of Karnataka V Balasubramanian. Pic: Nikita Malusare

Prior to 1974, Bangalore completely depended on Tippagondanahalli, Hesaraghatta reservoir, Sankey and Dharmambudhi tanks for water supply. Presently Bangalore has only three sources of water: Cauvery, Arkavathi and Vrishabhavathi. Bangalore draws 140 Million Litres per Day (MLD) which has already exceeded its limit of 90 TMC as fixed by the Central Cauvery Water Tribunal.

City’s lakes have been disappearing at the same speed with which the city’s population is growing, remarked Balasubramaniam.

He said, “City dies when lakes die.” He firmly stated that, “You cannot ‘restore’ a lake by building fences or parks around it. Unless you divert the sewage water, lakes cannot be restored.”

He mentioned in his presentation that, 850 kms of Rajakaluves (Storm Water Drains) that are constructed to divert the excess water from one lake to another are carelessly encroached, destructed, blocked by bus stations, railways, stadiums, golf clubs, big IT parks and apartments. 

Is ‘distilled water’ purified contaminated water?

He said Bengaluru is no more the city of lakes, instead it has become city of sewage tanks. Out of 600 lakes, BBMP claims to have only 189 live lakes. If noticed carefully, the colour of the lake water is bluish or darkish, which is nothing but the sewage water let into the tanks without care. This water gets percolated into the ground water or borewells that contaminate the underground water which reaches your house. The same water is also used by the distilled water bottle manufacturing units, he explained.

Department of Mines and Geology came out with an alarming report in 2011 which said that, 52% of bore well water in Bangalore is non-potable, stated Balasubramanian. The reports also mentioned that 27% of this water contains Escherichia Coli.

Bacterial contamination can kill people

Escherichia Coli, also called as E. Coli is one of the four dangerous bacteria that are present in the non-potable water that Bangalore consumes. It is found to infect intestine, thus leading to severe diarrhoea and loss of excess blood, fever etc., he said. Balasubramanian warned the audience that infection by E. Coli cannot be treated by any regular diarrhoea courses as it will aggravate the bacteria.

In the USA, 20,000 people were affected by E.Coli out of which seven per cent of the people died. The only cure for the infection is complete blood transfusion and dialysis.

Public Health Institute studied 1,428 water samples collected from all over the city, both Cauvery water and bore well water, and found that 59% of the samples contained E.Coli and maximum level of contamination was found at developed areas. This is because the sewage water in pipelines that run parallel to drinking water pipelines percolate into potable water due to leakage, and thus contaminates it.

Balasubramaniam told that he had questioned Dr Chidambaram, who is in charge of Microbiology Lab of Public Health Institute, as to why there has been no outbreak of any kind of epidemic due to the contamination. Dr Chidambaram replied, “People of Bangalore have developed immunity as they have been drinking it for 10 years.”

Balasubramaniam remarked that every microorganism has the capacity to develop immunity. he referred to TB and Malaria microbes that have become highly resistant.

The only solution  for the E.Coli is not the Ultra-Violet rays as promised by the aquifers but the ancient method of boiling the at 100 degree centigrade, but even this kills the microbes only partially.

After all the negative news, Balasubramanian showed the audience aray hope as the High Court’s Environment Bench has taken into consideration the study published by Eureka Forbes Environment of Mumbai and called the government to explain the issue. The report outlined that water samples of 52 out of 92 areas surveyed in Bangalore had high level of Total Dissoluble Solids like nitrates, chloride etc.

Counter-attacking Balasubramanian, Gaurav Gupta argued that BWSSB uses chlorine to disinfect and also they have arranged central testing laboratories along with the mobile units. However, the BWSSB is helpless if the real estate mafia constructs buildings without making provision for sewage pipes.

Citizens of Bangalore actively participated in the discussions. Pic : Nikita malusare

Need to revise water tariff

He also mentioned that the BWSSB has taken up the task of replacing the old pipes with the new ones. To augment any kind of leakage, huge water meters are fixed on the pipes and leakage-detecting machines are being used by the department, he said.

Gaurav Gupta didn’t fail to mention the need for funds to maintain the system. He said, there is no budgetary assistance by the government to BWSSB and revision of water tariff will help the department to incur the operation and maintenance cost.

He said, “BWSSB spends Rs.35 crore for electric bills of the three pump houses situated at different stages. Therefore the actual delivery cost  of water should be Rs. 32 per KL but what consumers pay is subsidised rate, i.e. Rs. 9 per KL, as against other countries Singapore and Israel, who pay Rs. 85 to 95 per KL.”

Audience who came from different fields of expertise acknowledged the need to revise the water tariff. Audience said, if they pay thousands for electricity then why not water, which is a necessity. However, Gupta said that the government hasn’t grant him the permission to hike it even after several requests.

“RWH, a joke!!”

Both Balasubramanian and Gaurav agreed that Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) is mess in the city. In specific words of Balasubramanian, it is “a joke!!” Balsubramaniam noted that there are 18 lakh properties in Bangalore, but only 44,000 houses in the city have RWH, out of which only half per cent are in working condition.

Balasubramaniam mentioned that Singapore has met its need of water by creating RWH along the rooftops, roads and open spaces. He said, “60% of Singapore’s water requirement is met by built up area and open areas along the roads.”

Propagating the same idea, Gaurav mentioned Bangalore doesn’t have RWH along the open spaces, but the BWSSB makes it mandatory to people having more them. “If you have water connection and if you are in a site measuring more than 30X40, you need to have Roof Water Harvesting or your BWSSB line is liable to be disconnected, he added.

Funding by foreign banks to keep a check on expenditure

One of the solutions for funding water projects, Balsubramaniam suggested, is to take assistance of the World Bank, Asian Development Bank or Japan Bank of International Cooperation. These foreign institutes will keep in check the resistance and lethargy of BWSSB in completing the works, he remarked. He stressed on the need to have comprehensive schemes, not the contract-oriented projects.

Acknowledging the point, Gaurav spoke about the projects initiated by JBIC and World Bank in the south areas of Banglore and JNNURM schemes, currently the Jaika Project and Under Ground Development Infrastructure projects are in process. The UGD project is expected to complete in 12 months.

Justice Venkatachalaiah concluded the event by acknowledging both sides of the arguments and pointed at Gaurav for not having touched upon the issues raised by Balasubramanian, but nevertheless, he asked the Citizens to be equally involved in the conservation of the water and contribute to saving water by setting up RWH and channelising treated sewage water to the lakes in proper method.

Comments:

  1. Bhushit Joshipura says:

    All property owners in peripheral Bangalore have paid BWSSB charges.
    Now that BWSSB refuses to own up the responsibility, I think it makes a good case of at least PIL for refund.
    In the worst case, it will be interesting to see whether the court upholds any government agency charging money with a refusal to provide service.

  2. antony george says:

    Why is BBMP not taking action on people who encroach lakes?

    Why is BBMP not taking action on people who encroach rajkaluve (drains)?

    Why is BBMP not taking action on people who let sewage into storm water drains?

    Why is BWSSB not providing sewage connections to peripheral areas of Bangalore?

    Why is BWSSB allowing mixing of sewage water with drinking water? Why are they not putting new pipes?

    Why is RWH not implemented in Bangalore?

    All the problems lies with BBMP and BWSSB only. Their officials take bribe and allow encroachments of drains, unauthorized connections, unauthorized buildings, etc.

  3. Amit Kumar says:

    Where is the rule of law? Defaulter builders who do not have sewage links and flat owners who do not have RWH have to be penalized, not victimized for bribes. Prices of water and electricity have to be revised. It is a very simple thing to do—merely ask people what the price should be and the subsidy tax-payers would have to pay along with that.

  4. Anthonymuthu Xavier says:

    Growing population and rapid urbanisation put pressure on existing sources of water. Modern urban life style needs more amount of water than was the case earlier. The water supplied by rain gods is not sufficient to meet our escalating demand so we suck the water stored under ground over hundreds of thousands of years.Our lakes and ponds cannot retain rain water due to fast depleting underground sources. The rate of discharge of water from underground sources is faster than recharge by rain water. Any amount of RWH will not help unless we minimise the use of water.Human beings need to reduce water consumption. The rich and middle class need to change their life style so that water is not wasted on their lavish life style. The water charges in Singapore cannot be compared with their rates in our cities due to low income. There is no other alternative except to minimise the consumption of water for unnecessary activities.

  5. Bheema Upadhyaya says:

    RWH is not joke – at least at my home…

  6. Naimunnisa Khan says:

    I think this problem needs to be addressed at the overall management level. There has to be a system to control the rapid development and not give approval for construction in areas where there is no provision for water and sewage. The BBMP and the BWSSB should work hand in hand towards it.The so called real estate “mafia” is playing its expected part .They are trading off a low price(rs.sqft) at peripheral areas in exchange of low infrastructure and distance from CBD.We as individuals should decide if we must encourage them by buying houses here.I wonder what would happen if we could expect more transparency on the BWSSB’s side..What if every citizen could check the status of BWSSB phase wise water supply and sewage infrastructure online in each area before putting a lifetime income into a house.
    Its time everyone does their bit towards this problem. Like Mr. Balu mentioned that “this problem is a Leveller “- rich or poor ,real estate mafia or government, it will affect all .”History shows that cities die when lakes die,and we do not want history to repeat itself.”

  7. Rantjil Boulder says:

    I stay at Brindavan Layout, Vignan Nagar. Most of the time cauvery water is getting contaminated with sewage so we stopped using cauvery water and buying 20litres cane water for drinking purpose. Here is my article (http://cj.ibnlive.in.com/monsoon-road-condition-awful/7444/) about issues faced by residents.

  8. Ponnappan Pillai says:

    Today’s news read as (“BWSSB Chairman Gaurav Das Gupta declared that the peripheral areas of Bengaluru do not and will not have water for the upcoming years”). What about the areas within old BMP area? Most oft the residents of Muthyalanagara, ward No.17 (J.P.Park) are not getting water. We are managing the water through water tankers, private water tankers by paying money and bore wells. Many water tankers are moving through out the day in this area. This area is within 10 KM from the city and under corporation limit since 1984.Many complaints registered to BWSSB but no one is bothered about this area.

  9. MADAN IYENGAR says:

    Cauvery water for all was the mantra before laying the lines from all phases..now NO WATER…tanker water is the order of the day….it is time ( before there is war for water) resident welfare associations should press and act for treatment plants to be set up in parks in local areas to fill treated waste water in to lakes..ponds which could improve ground water levels…while rain water harvesting is seasonal..treated waste water could greatly help in increase ground water levels…
    Madan Iyengar
    http://www.ozosciences.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Opinion: Why climate action must recognise and include India’s informal workers

As COP29 discusses ways to mitigate the climate crisis, India must address the adversities faced by informal workers and chalk out plans.

The ongoing COP29 conference in Baku, is a pivotal moment in climate action, focusing on global cooperation to limit warming to 1.5°C. Key priorities include mobilising financial resources for developing countries to submit ambitious climate plans (NDCs) by 2025 and continuing support through the Fund for Loss and Damage (FRLD) established at COP28. COP29 also aims to strengthen adaptation efforts by setting finance-backed targets for the Global Goal on Adaptation.  While COP29 primarily focuses on international climate initiatives, India must address pressing domestic issues. One key group often overlooked is informal workers in Indian cities. Over 80% of India’s urban…

Similar Story

Status check: Key concerns remain as Chennai moves ahead with WTE plans

Greater Chennai Corporation's tender for the Waste-To-Energy plant is at the final stage; Here is what we know about the bidders

17,422 metric tonnes per day — that's the staggering amount of trash the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) will generate in 30 years. Currently, Chennai produces 6,143 metric tonnes of waste daily, which adds to the growing piles in Kodungaiyur and Perungudi dump yards. Like many other major cities, GCC is struggling to find a sustainable solution for waste management and has proposed a Waste-To-Energy (WTE) plant. However, the experiences of cities like Delhi are testimony to the significant environmental and health impacts of WTE plants. A recent The New York Times investigative report on the Delhi WTE reveals: "The government…