KSPCB asks BWSSB not to pollute water bodies

KSPCB has asked the BBMP to put the name of the offenders in public domain and levy fine.Will this stop people from polluting water bodies?

Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) has instructed Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) not to let sewage into the lakes, drains, rivers and wells of Bengaluru, in the backdrop of numerous complaints from the public.

The letter to BWSSB had been issued on March 30, 2014. However, a press note from KSPCB says that as nothing was done so far, KSPCB is releasing the matter to the notice of the media.

The press release issued by the KSPCB says that KSPCB Chairman Vaman Acharya has instructed the BWSSB not to let municipal waste to the water sources. Houses, apartments, layouts, townships etc should never leave their waste water into drains and lakes. In such instances, suitable fines should be levied in order to ensure that such violations don’t happen in future.

KSPCB has also asked the BWSSB to clean up the water bodies that are polluted. The offenders who pollute should be named publicly. There should not be permissions given to the townships or apartments where there is a possibility of leaving the sewage into nearby water bodies.

The letter also proposes to constitute a vigilance team that has suitable powers to protect water bodies and act on the complaints of water pollution.

If the BWSSB officials don’t act on the directions of the letter, they will have to face action as per Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act, warns KSPCB chairman Vaman Acharya.

This warning has been given in the backdrop of complaints by retired Wing Commander G B Athri,on the pollution of Arakere, Madiwala and Subbarayan Kere.

Where there’s a will, there’s away!

In January, BWSSB had launched an innovative system of treating the sewage flown in Storm Water Drain adjacent to the KR Puram Sewage Treatment Plant.

Storm Water Drains are not meant for sewage flow, but only for runoff during the rainy season. Unfortunately, sewage is being let in these canals. In this context, BWSSB arranged for a small barrage based treatment system, which is cost-effective and produced immediate result.

Constructing a medium height barrage across the SWD, collecting the sewage through a pipe by way of gravity into a pit, pumping this sewage into the STP, releasing the same, but fully treated water to the same SWD at a short distance of the barrage which eventually will reach the designated lake – this is the workflow for the new system. As a result, treated water, not the sewage reaches the lakes, thus the lakes will get highly reduced quantity of sewage inflow. The cost incurred was only Rs 95,000.

Many STPs in Bangalore are incidentally situated adjacent to these storm water drains, hence the possibility of replicating this new system is a near possibility.

The installed capacity of K R Puram STP is 20 MLD. But only 5 MLD of sewage is being treated now. After installing this barrage based additional system, the capacity utilisation has gone upto 10 MLD. The total installed capacity of the STPs in Bangalore is 842 MLD, but the load is only around 40%. It was estimated that the average capacity utilisation can be raised by 5-12 MLD in each STP, by way of installing these barrage based pumping of sewage from SWDs.

Related Articles

Pay BWSSB contractor to reconnect sewage line, or live with stink
Sewage from apartments flowing into Iblur lake kills fish

Comments:

  1. Commander C R Babu(Retd) says:

    When it comes to reigning the BWSSB, the Karnataka State Pollution Board becomes helpless and turns blind eye in preventing pollution of Puttenahalli lake at Yelahanka , despite intervention by Upalokayukta.No doubt the sewage flow into the Puttenahalli lake through drains have been stopped but is now being diverted to another Lake which has recently been restored by LDA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…