Info for voters of Mahalakshmi Layout Constituency- MLA, Candidate, Voting and more

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Mahalakshmi Layout, this is what you need to know!

Background information

Incumbent MLA: Gopalaiah K

Gopalaiah K

Party:Janata Dal (secular)

  • Family: Wife, 2 children
  • Educational Qualification: B.Sc
  • Profession:Politician/ Social Activist
  • Online:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth
    • IT Returns: Self-6.31Lacs, Spouse-5.78Lacs
    • Movable Assets: Self-49.26Lacs, Spouse-4.36cr, Son1-3.76Lacs, Son2-3.95Lacs(son)
    • Immovable Assets: Self-2.96cr, Spouse-2.87cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

Manjunatha H S  

 Party:Indian National Congress

  • Family:4 dependants
  • Educational Qualification:-
  • Profession:Business, Agriculture Equipment
  • Social Media:
  • Facebook: Manjunatha HS
  • Email ID:manjugowda90@gmail.com
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth
  • IT Returns:Self-10.13 lakhs
  • Movable Assets: Self-10.18 lakhs, Dependant1-25,894, Dependant2- 3.69 lakhs
  • Immovable Assets:NIL
  • Liabilities:4.82 lakhs

N L Narendra Babu

Party:Bharatiya Janata Party

  • Family:Wife, 1 son, 2 dependants
  • Educational Qualification: B.Sc
  • Profession: Artist/ Actor
  • Online:
    • Facebook:nela narendrababu
    • Instagram:narendrababu ex mla
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth
    • IT Returns:7.60Lacs
    • Movable Assets:Self-16.83Lacs, Spouse-4Lacs
    • Immovable Assets: 2.08cr
    • Liabilities:4.60Lacs
  • Formerly from INC: Three times MLA from Rajajinagar, and then MLA from the newly carved constituency, Mahalakshmi Layout (2008).
  • 2009 Interview: “As an MLA, I have to wear many hats”

Full list of candidates: 

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-156.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results:

2013 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

Gopalaiah K

JD(S)

66127

52

44.73%

N L Narendra Babu

INC

50757

51

34.33%

S Harish

BJP

23545

45

15.93%

Veeresh Kumar T

KJP

2936

43

1.99%

Rajshree Muralidhar

LSP

1168

40

0.79%

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share%

N L Narendra Babu

INC

42652

46

37.62%

R V Hareesh

BJP

39427

49

34.77%

K Gopalaiah

JD(S)

28097

47

24.78%

V Harish

IND

1054

33

0.93%

Somu

BSP

708

56

0.62%

Citizen Demands

About the Constituency:

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-156.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

The Mahalakshmi Layout assembly constituency is situated in northwest Bengaluru. It is considered to be the third largest residential layout in the city, following Jayanagar and Banashankari.

Its six wards are Mahalakshmipuram, Nandini Layout, Geleyarabalaga, Nagapura, Kamalanagar and Vrishabhavathinagar.

The layout faced a special problem when heavy rains lashed it in 2017, killing five. The Vrishabhavathi valley flooded houses between Laggere and Yeshwanthpur. Garbage and sewage choked the region.

Residents were furious and accused the authorities of having done little to improve the area. They urged the authorities to upgrade and improve it and received a plethora of promises, including upgrading 23 of the 53 parks here. Narrow roads and lack of water supply plagues the region. Due to fast growth, there has been an exodus of workers from Peenya to Nandini Layout and Mahalakshmipuram.

  • The total number of voters in 2008 :113,404,
  • The total number of voters in 2013:1,48,061
  • Currently, the number of registered voters: 2,86,923.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…