Ward information page: Ward 54 – Hudi

What were the works done in Hudi ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

54 – Hudi

 

Like all other wards in the city, this ward too suffers from road problems despite the BBMP spending heaviy on it. There is an active citizen community trying to change the way things are, however tangible results are yet to be seen. The ward has an odd structure, with four disjoint areas of land formig one ward, making the administration and cordination among agencies difficult and causing confusion among voters. More information on the ward:

MLA (2013): Arvind Limbavali (BJP), Mahadevapura
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010

Corporator: B A Basavaraju (INC)
#331, Srirama Nilaya, Byrathi, Doddagubbi Post, Bangalore-49. Ph: 9844029229
Reservation: BC-A

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 41.5
Winner’s margin: 7151
Total votes polled: 16470
Total voters: 28149

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 42842
Male: 24088
Female: 8730
Others: 24

Reserved: SC

Contesting Candidates

BJP: HV Manjunath
INC: Hariprasad AC
JDS: M Venkatesh
Independent: 
Belathur Venkatesh
Bharatiya Praja Paksha: S M Krishna

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 50191
  • Households: 12579
  • Area: 15 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 759 km
  • Lakes: Sadara mangala, Hoodi Kere -2, Jimkenahalli, Total area: 29.6 sq km
  • Parks: 7, Total area: 2.1 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 0, Total area: 0 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

  • Whitefield Rising
  • Bruhat Whitefield Residential Communities Association
  • Hoodi Rising

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

More information on candidates

No candidates have filled the information collection form so far. If you know anyone contesting, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud


Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

Ward information page: Ward 149 – Varthur
All you need to know about Ward 84 – Hagadur
All you need to know about Ward 85 – Doddanekkundi
Ward information page: Ward 83 – Kadugodi
Ward information: 82 – Garudacharpalya

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Odisha’s Jaga Mission upholds a model for empowering grassroots urban communities

The Jaga Mission shows the path to institutionalised, decentralised participatory governance through three main areas of intervention.

As Odisha’s Jaga Mission progressed, the vision expanded from developing slums into liveable habitats with the active participation of the community, to developing the upgraded slums as empowered units of hyperlocal self-governance. The highlights of participatory slum transformation were discussed in the first part of this series. Taking forward the idea of collaborative problem solving, the Mission now sought to put in place systems to institutionalise decentralised participatory governance in the upgraded slum neighbourhoods. The objective was to transfer the management of neighbourhoods, encompassing the 4 lakh slum households across 115 cities in the state, to the Slum Dwellers Associations…

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s budget dilemma: Concrete promises, crumbling trust

As traffic worsens, lakes vanish, and local democracy stalls, Bengaluru’s challenges run deeper than infrastructure can fix.

The Karnataka state budgets for 2025–26 present an ambitious blueprint for Bengaluru. With allocations that rival national infrastructure plans — ₹40,000 crore for tunnel corridors, ₹8,916 crore for a double-decker flyover, and ₹27,000 crore for the newly coined “Bengaluru Business Corridor” the government appears determined to transform the city’s landscape. But this grand investment raises a deeper question: Is this a vision for a people-centred city or simply an infrastructure-centric spectacle? What emerges is a familiar story, not unique to Bengaluru but emblematic of urban development across India. Faced with growing chaos, the instinct is to “throw concrete at the…