All you need to know about Ward 21 – Hebbal

What are the complaints bothering Hebbala voters? How much money was spent in the ward? What were the works done?

21 – Hebbala

Sitting corporator is recontesting from Hebbal ward. While all wards generally see an increase in voters’ numbers, this has reduced from what it was during 2010 elections. More information on this ward follows:

MLA (2013): R Jagadeesh Kumar (BJP), Hebbal
MP (2014): D V Sadananda Gowda (BJP), Bangalore North

BBMP 2010

Corporator: C.R. Jayappa Reddy (BJP)
#1, Manjunatha Nilaya, 287 E, Near Bus Stand, Cholanayakanahalli, Bangalore-3. Ph: 9243100746
Reservation: G

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 23.8
Winner’s margin: 3049
Total votes polled: 12687
Total voters: 27970

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 26448
Male: 13724
Female: 12722
Others: 2

Reserved: General

Contesting Candidates

BJP: Jayappa Reddy
INC: Anand Kumar
JDS: Kiran Kumar
BSP: Narayana Swamy
Independent: Vinay Garuda, Hanumantharaya Gowda, C M Narayanaswamy

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 32516
  • Households: 8181
  • Area: 1.2 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 383 km
  • Lakes: 0, Total area: 0 sq km
  • Parks: 10, Total area: 1.3 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 4, Total area: 1.3 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

More information on candidates

There are no candidates contesting the BBMP elections- 2015 from this ward, whose information is available with Citizen Matters. If you do not find a particular candidate on this page, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It may not be from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

Ward information – Ward 93: Vasanth Nagar
All you need to know about Ward 45 – Malleshwaram
All you need to know about Ward 19 – Sanjay Nagar
‘Cash for coverage’ comes to BBMP elections too
BBMP Elections 2015: Special coverage by Citizen Matters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Check how your MPs have performed in Parliament (and here’s why)

From 100% attendance to only 26%, how did your MP perform this Budget Session? See who is truly representing your voice in our MP Tracker.

When Ranjan Gogoi, the former Chief Justice of India, retired from the Rajya Sabha two months ago, his performance in Parliament became a matter of debate. As per an analysis by Livelaw, Gogoi did not ask a question to the government even once during the six years of his tenure and participated in the debate on only one Bill.  More recently, when seven AAP MPs defected to BJP, another analysis by Indian Express revealed that one of these seven defecting MPs, Harbhajan Singh, a former cricketer, had only 26% attendance.  Why do we typically go around digging data on the…

Similar Story

Deepening reservoirs, rainwater harvesting: Sustainable alternatives to the Mamallan dam

Why Mamallan reservoir? Experts say Chennai's water future lies in greener solutions — desilting old reservoirs and maintaining neglected tanks.

Ever since the contentious Mamallan reservoir was proposed in the ecosensitive Kovalam–Nemmeli backwater system, fisher communities in Chennai have repeatedly asked: Does it have to be here? Experts and scientists say no, urging the government to abandon the project and work on sustainable alternatives.  Critics point to a long list of costs: high expenditure, land acquisition, and risks to livelihoods and biodiversity. As we have reported earlier, the central concern driving the project is the looming drinking water supply crisis – demand is projected to rise from 1,100 million litres a day (MLD) to over 2,500 MLD for the Greater…