Give more money to urban local bodies, but on condition: XV Finance Commission

The report submitted by the XV Finance Commission for 2020-21 recommends a substantial increase of close to 30% in grants available to ULBs, but to avail these, they must notify minimum rates of property tax, show improvement in revenue and submit audited accounts. Take a look at the detailed recommendations.

The Central Finance Commission is a constitutionally mandated commission that has the key function of recommending how financial resources will be shared between the central governments and state governments, and between individual state governments.  It is constituted every five years, generally for a two year term, and is also required to make recommendations on strengthening financial resources of panchayats and municipalities (also known as urban local bodies).

The Finance Commission’s terms of reference are drawn up by the central government, but its report is required to be tabled in Parliament.

Generally the Finance Commission submits a single report sometime during Oct-Dec for five financial years, commencing on 1 April of the following financial year.  However the XV Finance Commission has submitted a report for FY 2020-21, as it received a year’s extension and is scheduled to now submit its final report in October 2020 for FY 2021-22 to FY 2025-26.  The central government has tabled an explanatory memorandum in Parliament on the action taken on these recommendations.

The Finance Commission’s recommendations have over the years not just resulted in significant grants to urban local bodies (ULBs), but have also catalysed far-reaching reforms in respect of financial accountability.  The XV Finance Commission has carried forward the tradition, but with its own distinct emphasis in three significant ways:

1) It has increased the total wallet share of local bodies (from 3.5% to 4.3% of resources being divided by the XV FC, referred to as the divisible pool), and within that, the share of urban local bodies (from 30% to 40% by end of XV FC’s period), setting the stage for significantly higher resources for urban local bodies.

2) It has moved away from a one-size-fits-all approach and raised the stakes for larger cities, by increasing their fund allocation but holding them to a higher bar of performance (only tied grants, no untied grants), AND by recognising the metropolitan character (as against municipal character) of these cities

3) Finally by treating audited accounts as an entry criterion, i.e. without which no grants would be awarded to any urban local body,  the Commission has sought to take close to two decades of emphasis on financial management reforms to a logical culmination.  It has also set an ambitious agenda for integrating accounting systems across levels of government, besides calling for a national online platform for municipal accounts.

Key Highlights of XV Finance Commission recommendations
  • Substantive increase in grants to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) to c. Rs 30,000 cr, an increase of 29% from grants in 2019-20.
  • Special focus on metropolitan governance through 100% performance linked grants (Rs 9,229 cr) for million+ Urban Agglomerations (UAs) tied to air quality, water and sanitation. These 50 UAs with million plus population consist of 264 ULBs and 40% of the urban population.
  • For the other 3,771 ULBs, grants of Rs 20,021 cr with 50% untied and the remaining 50% tied specifically to drinking water and solid waste management.
  • To be eligible for ANY grant from 2021-2022, ULBs to meet two entry level conditions (i) notifying floor or minimum rates of property tax and thereafter show improvement in revenue AND (ii) timely submission of audited accounts.
  • MoHUA to create a national online platform for publication of ULB accounts and CAG to lead the efforts to build an integrated accounting system to facilitate integrated view of ULB accounts with state accounts, leveraging the IFMIS/PFMS.

For more details on eligibility and allocation of grants to urban local bodies, check this document.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Mapping Bengaluru’s stormwater drains: A citizen’s audit guide

Citizen-led audits of Bengaluru’s stormwater drains aim to expose accountability gaps and reclaim these neglected lifelines as public commons.

Stormwater drains are not just “invisible infrastructure.” They are the frontline of Bengaluru’s water security. When they fail, lakes die, groundwater gets poisoned, and neighbourhoods flood. Understanding this system is the first step toward reclaiming it, because without citizen awareness, the crisis remains hidden beneath our feet. In an earlier article, we explored how stormwater drains are the frontline of Bengaluru’s water security. Part 2 of the series shows how citizens can take action themselves by learning the typology of drains and conducting audits using simple tools. Accountability gaps in Bengaluru’s stormwater worksOver the years, Bengaluru’s SWD network has been…

Similar Story

Explained: Bengaluru’s stormwater drain system and the city’s water story

Bengaluru’s stormwater drains, hidden yet vital, channel rain across valleys—when neglected, they fuel floods, sewage leaks, and lake death.

Every summer, Bengaluru’s water crisis makes headlines; tanker prices soar, lakes dry up, and citizens protest encroachments, fish kills, and sewage inflows. While lakes and tanks often dominate the conversation, there’s another hidden system that quietly shapes the city’s water story: stormwater drains (SWDs). These drains are more than just channels; they are the veins of a valley city. Bengaluru sits on a central ridgeline that naturally divides its water flow into two directions: Eastward: draining into the Dakshina Pinakini (Ponnaiyar) River. Westward: draining into the Cauvery Basin via the Vrishabhavathi River. Ironically, what citizens often see as footpaths or…