Video explainer: How effective is the Model Code of Conduct, really?

Instances of alleged violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) in these elections have been numerous. What does the MCC really imply and how binding is it? The next in the Factly series of videos deconstructing various aspects of Indian elections takes a look.

Controversy over the timing of release of a biopic on the head of government, ‘main bhi chowkidar’ caps found on vehicles of election commission vehicles, repeated instances of hate speech and communal references by leaders of contesting parties — the number of violations of the ‘Model Code of Conduct’ ahead of elections has been quite mindboggling in these elections. But what is this ‘code’, really and what happens if parties or individuals decide to just flout the rules?

The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a set of guidelines defining the dos and don’ts for the political parties and candidates during elections. The main purpose of this is to provide a level playing field for all candidates contesting the elections and to bring decency and consistency to the chaotic election process. The surprising thing is that the idea of MCC came from the political parties, themselves.

The MCC comes into effect as soon as the election dates are declared by the ECI. It remains in place until the election results are declared. However, it is not a statutory document. It just provides a guideline for free and fair elections.

Watch the video below to know more about the areas of electoral misconduct covered by the MCC. Some of the questions answered are:

  • What are the basic guidelines of the MCC?
  • Can parties and candidates create hatred between communities?
  • In case of meetings and processions, do political parties have to take permission for loudspeakers and microphones?
  • What are the rules regarding conduct of polling at the booth on the day of the election? Can anyone and everyone enter the polling booth?
  • Are there guidelines in the MCC regulating social media campaigns?

[This video series is produced by Factly as a part of the YouTube GNI Innovation Funding and has been republished here with permission.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Chennai to lose thrice as many trees as originally estimated for Metro Phase II

Over 8,000 trees would be either felled or transplanted for the project. Meanwhile, over a third of the transplanted trees haven't survived.

‘Inconvenience today for a better tomorrow’ signs follow commuters across the city as work inches on for the 118-km Chennai Metro Phase II. Residents eagerly await three corridors that will connect Madhavaram to SIPCOT, Lighthouse to Poonamalle Bypass, and Madhavaram to Sholinganallur by 2028. But the project is resulting in an irreversible loss of green cover along the corridors, far more than was estimated at the time of its approval. A total of 8,029 trees would be affected, either felled or transplanted, for the project. Over 7,000 of these trees have been uprooted already. Though new trees are planted to…

Similar Story

A decade without a Master Plan: Who should be planning Bengaluru’s future?

Bengaluru’s future must focus on breaking free from outdated frameworks and embracing citizen-led, climate-resilient planning.

Nearly a decade ago, while I was working on the Revised Master Plan for Bengaluru (RMP 2031), a senior planner remarked: “Only the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) has the legal right to plan for Bengaluru.” Today, that assertion is unravelling in a tussle between the newly formed Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) and the BDA over who should plan for the city’s future. What is more troubling is that Bengaluru’s current master plan, the RMP 2015, is based on surveys from 2003, nearly two decades out of date. The Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act (KTCPA) of 1961 requires revision every…