Death of 8-year-old in storm water drain: PIL filed against BBMP

Namma Bengaluru Foundation and Rajyasabha MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar file PIL for initiation of criminal action against errant BBMP officials who were responsible for open storm water drain.

A Public Interest Litigation has been initiated by Bangalore-based NGO Namma Bengaluru Foundation (NBF) asking for criminal proceedings against the BBMP officials responsible for open drain in Bilekanahalli. Excerpts from the press note from Namma Bengaluru Foundation:

In the aftermath of the death of Geetha Lakshmi, the eight-year-old, who fell into an open flooded drain; and Yeshwant, a 12-year old, who fell into an open unsecured flooded pit respectively, Namma Bengaluru Foundation and Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Member of Parliament have filed a public interest litigation in the High Court of Karnataka today. (October 9, 2014)

The PIL filed in the Karnataka High Court on Thursday seeks directions of the court to the State to conduct an enquiry to identify the administrators and officers derelict in the conduct of their statutory duties, leaving  drains uncovered, and are thus criminally culpable for their negligence.

The PIL also prays for a direction from the court, to the Chief Secretary to initiate criminal prosecutions against such deviant and errant officers, who are guilty of criminal negligence, resulting in the failure of governance and administration in the city.

The petitioners have highlighted several similar tragedies in the past resultant of the negligence and callousness on the part of authorities. The deaths of Pukhraj Jain who died falling into an open flooded drain right outside his house; Rihan, a three-year-old toddler being washed away in a storm water drain just behind his house in Roopena Agrahara in 2011; six-year-old Abhishek being washed away in an open drain in Lingarajapuram in 2009 have been highlighted in the PIL. It has been pleaded that none of these deaths have led to criminal liability being fastened on the officials guilty of criminal negligence. 

In an effort to ensure such tragedies are not repeated, the petition also seeks directions to the Secretary, Urban Development Department and the Commissioner, BBMP to prepare  a time-bound, comprehensive plan of action for undertaking and establishing safety and security mechanisms, pertaining to public drains and other utility services such as electricity supply etc. Chandrasekhar has also sought a direction from the court to the BBMP to undertake immediate steps to close all open drains and manholes in the city and provide adequate signage, warning the people of hazards.

The petition is a step that aims to ensure that the officers responsible for maintaining public utilities and services are made accountable for their actions and omissions. This petition also arises in the backdrop of the High Court of Karnataka having previously initiated suo motu actions in case of deaths of children by drowning in flooded and abandoned quarry pits in the State.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

PG collapse in Delhi’s Satya Niketan: Who is responsible?

A DU PG collapse exposes the gap between Delhi's planning rules and real building safety. Watch this video to know more.

On September 6, a five-storey boys' Paying Guest (PG) accommodation collapsed in Satya Niketan, near Delhi University's South Campus, leaving seven people dead. This video looks beyond the single building to ask how the neighbourhood reached this point. Delhi has had a formal planning system since the DDA was set up in 1957 and the first Master Plan followed in 1962. Yet Satya Niketan has grown into a dense student housing hub. Officials say the collapsed building had permission for only the ground plus first floors. Ayush Anilal, an architect, studied the area for his thesis. He explains how intensely…

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…