Curious case of disqualified voters!

CEO Karnataka published the final electoral roll on January 11th. Surprisingly, over 2,000 voters have been disqualified from the list.

If you are a resident of Hagadoor, Muneshwara Nagar, Kumaraswamy Layout or a few other wards, it’s better you verify your name in the final electoral roll published by the Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka. There are chances that you might have been “disqualified” from voting! Higher the chances of disqualification if your ward comes under Mahadevapura Assembly Constituency.

Like every year, the office of the Chief Electoral Officer published the final electoral roll for the year 2016, on January 11th. Most of them might not have checked their names in the electoral roll after it was published, as election is not round the corner. But, if you check now, you may end up being the one whose name is disqualified from voting!

According to electoral roll analyst P G Bhat, as many as 2,007 voters have been disqualified from voting in the final roll published in January, for reasons unknown. Surprisingly, in Mahadevapura Assembly Constituency alone, closely 1,700 voters have been disqualified.

Disqualification for no reason

Citizen Matters independently verified partial data and found that in Part 305 of Mahadevapura Constituency, a total of 410 voters have been disqualified. In Part 304 in the same constituency, 179 voters are disqualified.

The supplement part of the electoral roll lists out the additions, deletions and modifications in the voters list. The deletion could be because of expiry, shifting the residence, disqualification or repetition. The reason for deletion is given using letter codes on each of the deleted voters. If letter ‘E’ stands for expiry, ‘S’ is for shift or change in residency, ‘Q’ stands for disqualification and ‘R’ is for repetition.

In some of the wards / parts, the reason for deleting the voter from the list is coded as ‘Q’ which means he/she is disqualified from voting. A person if disqualified, cannot exercise franchise in the election. Moreover, disqualification is not an easy process and CEO cannot disqualify a person from the electoral roll without citing reasons. As per Representation of People’s Act, 1950, a person could be disqualified from registering in an electoral roll only for three reasons.

A person could be disqualified if he/she,

  • Is not a citizen of India
  • Is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court
  • Is for the time-being disqualified from voting under the provision of any law relating to corrupt practices and other offences in connection with election

But, none of this seems to be the valid reason for disqualification of voters in bulk in some of the constituencies in Bengaluru.

The reason: typographical error!

To dissect the reason for voter roll anomaly, P G Bhat filed an RTI seeking for information from the CEO in January. “After a month, the CEO forwarded the RTI query to EROs asking them to directly respond to me. The EROs after another one month, sent RTI query to AEROs. So far I have got reply from 15 of them, while most of them have chosen not to reply. Some of the AEROs have said that there was no issue in their electoral roll and none are disqualified. Where as some of them have conceded that it was due to typographical error,” Bhat says. He wonders why none of the voters have opted to question the grave error.

Bhat believes that a software change or modification would solve the problem. He has earlier written to the Election Commissioner of India to give directive to all CEOs to modify ERMS data entry software suitably to check many such errors.

When Citizen Matters asked Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka Anil Kumar Jha about disqualification of voters in such a large number, he said he was aware of the issue and it will be rectified. “Disqualification has happened by mistake. Computer operators might have entered it wrongly in case of voter deletion due to shifting of constituency. I have directed the lower officers to ensure that the clerical staff rectify the errors,” he said.

Related Articles

Six reasons why Bengaluru’s voter roll lacks quality
Name on roll, but no EPIC card? Don’t worry

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Cities for women: This Women’s Day, let’s look beyond the numbers

50% reservation for women in local bodies of 17 states. Women mayors in 19 state capitals. Why, then, is gender-inclusive planning still a dream?

Step out on any morning in an Indian city, and you will find women contributing significantly to the vibrancy of urban life: walking children to school, waiting at bus stops, navigating crowded markets, heading to work, stitching together livelihoods and families across multiple trips and responsibilities. Urban India is home to about 181.6 million women, nearly 48% of its population. Yet, women hardly have a voice in how cities are planned, designed, and governed.  Globally, there is growing recognition that women-centric urban planning and governance work better for everyone. A 2021 study by UN-Habitat found, for instance, that gender-inclusive planning…

Similar Story

Public gatherings in Tamil Nadu: SOPs must be followed in full spirit for safety

New SOPs in Tamil Nadu mandate safety measures at mass events, placing responsibility on organisers to protect participants.

In a country like ours, where mass gatherings of various kinds are an integral part of life, we keep hearing of stampedes invariably leading to casualties, every now and then. Last year saw two such events, which made national headlines and shook the nation, one a sports victory parade gone sour in Bengaluru and the other, a stampede at a political road show in Karur, Tamil Nadu. The year before, Chennai witnessed huge crowds at an IAF show on the Marina Beach, which led to five deaths and more than a hundred hospitalisations due to heat-related issues and chaos arising…