Chennaiites cut sorry figure in rainwater harvesting, thanks to poor enforcement

Effective harvesting of rain water can significantly reduce dependence on tankers and prevent floods, but only 2% of households having RWH infrastructure are doing it as instructed by the state guidelines.

Rainwater Harvesting (RWH), an effective solution for flooding and water scarcity, is collapsing in the state that pioneered this conservation model in the country. RWH structures have a nominal presence in many households in Chennai, but rarely ever follow the guidelines that advise harvesting water from the rooftop as well as setback area (around the building).

A Rainwater Harvesting Audit carried out by the Akash Ganga Trust for the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority in 2015 exposed the reality of rainwater harvesting in the city and it’s not something we can be proud of.

A majority of households lack RWH structures in the setback area. The survey, conducted in a total of 1348 dwelling units, found that 27 per cent of them are not RWH compliant. 98% of those, who have rainwater harvesting infrastructure, were harvesting only terrace rainwater and only a miniscule 2% were harvesting the rainwater falling over the open spaces around the buildings, the survey noted.

Observing the locality-wise break up, the survey stated, “Non-compliance is highest in Thiruvottiyur with about 47% of them not even having the structures. On the other hand, only 11% of the residents in Velachery have not implemented the RWH ordinance.”

The compliance in Kottivakkam and Selaiyur are 29% and 19% respectively. Explaining the variations, Sekhar Raghavan, director of Rain Centre and a part of the team conducting the survey, said, “Non-compliance is more pronounced in the mixed residential category. Lack of space within the households was cited as a reason. A sizeable 11 per cent of houses blamed it on the builders for not providing the RWH structures.”

Renovated buildings lack RWH structures

Amendments made to Section 215 (a) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 and Building Rules 1973, have made it compulsory to have RWH structures in all new buildings.  To state it simply, a new building without a RWH structure would not be given water and sewer connections from the Chennai Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board. However, the loopholes in the law make it convenient for the public to escape the scanner.

More than ten people that Citizen Matters spoke to admitted that they had not built RWH structures in their renovated households. R Parvathy, who has built a house atop an already existing one in Tambaram said, “I am yet to fix the pipelines that carry the water from the terrace to the underground sump.” She had no answer when asked about the reasons for the delay.

Lack of enforcement was a major reason for the existing lapses. Ironically, a majority of the engineers from the metro water department, who inspect the households before providing the water and sewer connections, are oblivious of the existing guidelines.

An area engineer from the metro water department said, “We provide connections, only if the households have harvested their roof top. We are not particular about the setback area. If they do it, their ground water storage would certainly benefit.”

The reply shows that the law, which mandates harvesting setback area (also) is practically toothless where there is an absence of sufficient enforcement.

Why is RWH critical for Chennai?

It is imperative that we improvise manage and conserve our groundwater resources efficiently, considering the fact that Chennai has no perennial rivers. According to a survey conducted by Centre for Science and Environment in 2000, more than 60 per cent of the citizens rely on groundwater, while 40 per cent rely on Chennai Metro water.

In fact, Chennai Metro Water also relies on groundwater from Tiruvallur and Kancheepuram districts, in addition to the four rain-dependent reservoirs (Poondi, Cholavaram, Red Hills and Chembarambakkam) and the two desalination plants (Nemmeli and Minjur), to meet the water supply needs of the city.

Multiple surveys and audits have shown that a city resident on average gets only only half his requirement of water. “When the water consumption pattern is analysed, a Chennaiite uses anywhere between 50 – 90 litres of water a day, which falls far below the standards set by the Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (150 litres per capita consumption),” says hydro-geologist J Saravanan.

In  suburban Chennai, where residents spend a large chunk of their income on  purchasing water from  private water tankers, RWH can be the best choice to increase the groundwater table. “The well that had run dry last year now has water to the brim, thanks to rainwater harvesting. I no longer buy water from  tankers, as the well water suffices for my family’s needs,” says Anju Raj, a resident of Guindy.

For all who have not yet installed RWH facilities or are not using it optimally, Anju’s example should be a wake-up call. For many, however, getting started and ensuring proper processes pose stiff challenges in themselves. In a follow-up article, we shall look at a complete guide for citizens looking at harvesting rainwater in the best and most effective manner possible.

Comments:

  1. Mou_Lee says:

    Nice article… Cities like Chennai needs RWH.. It’s a curse to purchase water, a natural resource for all living being..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Warnings overlooked: Mumbai floods intensify despite reports and recommendations

Years after the deluge of 26th July 2005, Mumbai continues to flood every monsoon and expert committee reports on flood mitigation lie ignored.

A day before the 19th anniversary of the 26th July deluge, Mumbai recorded the second wettest July ever. Needless to say, the city also witnessed multiple incidents of waterlogging, flooding and disruption in train services and traffic snarls. Some of the explanations for the floods included record heavy rains, climate change, inadequate desilting of drains. There were protests on the ground and outrage on social media.   Incidentally, floods — its causes and solutions in Mumbai — have been studied since 2005, when the biggest and most damaging flood struck Mumbai and claimed 1094 lives after the city witnessed 944.2 mm…

Similar Story

After long wait for landowners, construction set to begin in EVP Township

The EVP Township Landowners' Association is working to develop their 18-year-old township with support from the Tharapakkam Panchayat

For years, long-time residents of Chennai, who bought plots in a suburban township in Tharapakkam, had to endure many hardships before they could rightfully claim their land. However, they did not give up. And now, there is a glimmer of hope as the persistence of the landowners has borne fruit. The local panchayat has also agreed to extend support, so that they can build their dream homes. In 2006, EVP Housing Pvt Ltd released colour advertisements in newspapers and distributed flyers offering plots for sale in Tharapakkam. These plots would form a township known as the EVP Township, situated five…