To B or not to B: Weighing the BRTS option for OMR

Residents of OMR attended a public consultation for the proposed Bus Rapid Transit System in Chennai but remain apprehensive about the project and its utility for them. Here's why.

Last week the consultants tasked with preparing the Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the BRTS invited us to a meeting. A few of us from FOMRRA (Federation of OMR Resident Associations), representing citizens living and using OMR (Old Mahabalipuram Road), went to the meeting.

The show started with some short films on the “successfully implemented projects” in Pune, Amdavad, Hubli-Dharwad and others. As the consultation started more than an hour late, they breezed through a PowerPoint presentation. However, we, who follow the mass transit planning and development studies associated with OMR, found that most of the data presented was based on an outdated 2011 report by ITDP. We also found that very little data, especially in terms of vehicle numbers, had been updated and the figures quoted rarely matched with the data that FOMRRA had collected.

Given the fact that OMR is owned/managed by the Tamil Nadu Road Development Company (TNRDC), there was no clarity about the partnership between the two – the toll collecting wing of the government which promises 6 lanes plus service lanes for the toll collected, and the BRTS, which is going to reduce the available number of lanes to 4. Will this reduce the toll rates?

As OMR residents, we believe that any “cut and paste” or “one size fits all” solution that could apply to any other part of Chennai cannot work in OMR because of its unique ecosystem. What we require here is a supplementary feeder service that will enable citizens living in the interior areas to reach the central median of OMR – alignment of the new metro rail system.

Most of the “high quality features” that the consultants were pitching — such as tracking, air conditioned buses and stops, accessibility, etc — can easily be implemented in the current bus system itself. Just because the existing bus and metro system are not disabled-friendly, we don’t go about building an entirely new system. We can solve these issues by strategically building ramps, escalators and elevators. The MTC has already announced that they will be making some buses on all routes disabled-friendly.

As representatives of welfare associations of OMR, we want the consultants to go back to the drawing board and propose a customised solution that would work for our area.

Comments:

  1. Sriram says:

    The entire BRTS idea seems to be ITDP’s brainchild as that seems to be their only agenda. With the city firmly embracing the Metro, most of the proposed corridors overlap the two phases of metro rail and need to be redone. However, the consultants can’t be blamed as the corridors have been selected by ITDP and Govt of Tamil Nadu

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Give us good roads, protect public spaces: Chandivali residents’ manifesto for BMC polls

Chandivali Citizens Welfare Association in Mumbai urges civic accountability, pothole-free roads and pollution control in its 24-point manifesto.

Chandivali is a rapidly developing, upscale residential and commercial suburb in Andheri East, with both business hubs and green spaces such as the Powai Lake. It is close to the neighbourhoods of Powai, Saki Naka and Vikhroli. Many long-pending civic issues in the locality need the attention of the municipal authorities, and the residents of Chandivali have been demanding infrastructure development in the area. As the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) election approaches, we reiterate our demand for better roads and improved civic facilities. Since founding the Chandivali Citizens Welfare Association (CCWA) in 2017, we have consistently raised and reported numerous…

Similar Story

How a Bengaluru initiative is involving the community to revamp public spaces

GBA’s Revitalising Public Spaces initiative engages citizens to transform 194 sites with safer, greener, community-friendly infrastructure.

The KEB Junction on 27th Main Road in HSR Layout highlights a typical urban planning failure. The junction prioritises vehicle movement over pedestrians. Resident Sachin Pandith, along with the HSR Community Task Force, has been working to address these issues and make the area safer. According to Sachin, residents have been engaging with officials and filing complaints for more than five years, yet nothing has changed. Encroached footpaths, unclear signage, and unsafe pedestrian crossings have created a hostile environment for walkers. In addition, the poorly located bus stop leaves little space for buses to halt, often turning the stretch into…