To B or not to B: Weighing the BRTS option for OMR

Residents of OMR attended a public consultation for the proposed Bus Rapid Transit System in Chennai but remain apprehensive about the project and its utility for them. Here's why.

Last week the consultants tasked with preparing the Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the BRTS invited us to a meeting. A few of us from FOMRRA (Federation of OMR Resident Associations), representing citizens living and using OMR (Old Mahabalipuram Road), went to the meeting.

The show started with some short films on the “successfully implemented projects” in Pune, Amdavad, Hubli-Dharwad and others. As the consultation started more than an hour late, they breezed through a PowerPoint presentation. However, we, who follow the mass transit planning and development studies associated with OMR, found that most of the data presented was based on an outdated 2011 report by ITDP. We also found that very little data, especially in terms of vehicle numbers, had been updated and the figures quoted rarely matched with the data that FOMRRA had collected.

Given the fact that OMR is owned/managed by the Tamil Nadu Road Development Company (TNRDC), there was no clarity about the partnership between the two – the toll collecting wing of the government which promises 6 lanes plus service lanes for the toll collected, and the BRTS, which is going to reduce the available number of lanes to 4. Will this reduce the toll rates?

As OMR residents, we believe that any “cut and paste” or “one size fits all” solution that could apply to any other part of Chennai cannot work in OMR because of its unique ecosystem. What we require here is a supplementary feeder service that will enable citizens living in the interior areas to reach the central median of OMR – alignment of the new metro rail system.

Most of the “high quality features” that the consultants were pitching — such as tracking, air conditioned buses and stops, accessibility, etc — can easily be implemented in the current bus system itself. Just because the existing bus and metro system are not disabled-friendly, we don’t go about building an entirely new system. We can solve these issues by strategically building ramps, escalators and elevators. The MTC has already announced that they will be making some buses on all routes disabled-friendly.

As representatives of welfare associations of OMR, we want the consultants to go back to the drawing board and propose a customised solution that would work for our area.

Comments:

  1. Sriram says:

    The entire BRTS idea seems to be ITDP’s brainchild as that seems to be their only agenda. With the city firmly embracing the Metro, most of the proposed corridors overlap the two phases of metro rail and need to be redone. However, the consultants can’t be blamed as the corridors have been selected by ITDP and Govt of Tamil Nadu

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: Budget’s Brand Bengaluru boost | Rise in plastic dependency…and more

Other news: Curb on plastic use in food preparation, Delhi speeds up Yamuna clean-up and new launches dominate home sales.

Brand Bengaluru gets a boost in the budget In his 16th Budget presented in the Karnataka Assembly, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the allocation of ₹1,800 crore for 21 projects under Brand Bengaluru, ₹3,000 crore to tackle weather-related challenges, and ₹555 crore for Phase 5 of the Cauvery water supply project. Bengaluru's urban mobility was highlighted, with the following plans — Namma Metro network's extension up to Kempegowda International Airport, an 18.5 km-long North-South tunnel from Hebbal Esteem Mall to Silk Board Junction for ₹15,000 crore, 40.5 km double-decker flyovers, 300 km of new roads and the Bengaluru Suburban Railway Project with…

Similar Story

Apartment regulation laws in Karnataka: Why we need urgent reforms

Part 1 of this three-part series on laws that govern Bengaluru's apartment ownership explores regulatory confusion and the need for clarity.

The rapid growth of apartment complexes in Bengaluru reflects the soaring urban housing demand. Stringent housing regulatory frameworks are essential for the balanced growth of the real estate sector. Currently, the apartment regulatory landscape in Karnataka is the cause of jurisdictional confusion and legal disputes. So, it is important to highlight the legal and practical challenges faced by apartment owners and associations. This assumes importance in the light of speculations of a proposed new legislative framework to govern apartments in the State.  Housing laws in Karnataka The Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as KCSA, 1959): The Act…