Lake isn’t just a blue water body, it’s a green wetland

Popular imagination of a lake has pristine blue water, walking tracks and jogging tracks. But in Bengaluru the ideal image of the lake isn't practically possible.

Our preferred imagination of an urban lake is mostly blue water with a well-maintained walking track all along, some trees on the periphery and some birds on them. That imagination is of course broken when the lake stinks, froths, has plastic strewn around. And when we see overgrown typha reeds in the lake, floating hyacinth and alligator weed, when the lake turns from blue to green, that imagination is broken. And then we want to rejuvenate the lake and turn it blue again.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

If we were to step back and think why is it that we really want the blue, or water, we realise a couple of things. These lakes we re man-made, created for purposes of flood control, irrigation, fishing, live stock and domestic purposes. However in most urban lakes, especially the smaller ones, even if the water were of good quality,

– We are not allowed to swim or bathe
– We are not allowed to fish unless we are a fishing contractor (with permissions from the fisheries department)
– We are not allowed to row a boat
– We are not allowed to immerse idols or other offerings. Immersions are to be made in a Kalyani that is specifically made for the purpose

Lakes continue to serve the below purposes:

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

– Lakes act as a flood control mechanism when the streams connect to the lake (and the flows are not obstructed)
– Lakes allow for groundwater recharge and places nearer the lake do observe an increase in ground water tables.
– Lakes help regulate temperature. The area around a lake is always much cooler 
– Lake is a pleasant place to walk around/socialise 
– Lake provides spaces for birds, reptiles and other living beings to breed and nest
– Lake is a place where societies/governments let in their treated/untreated waste water
– Lake is a place where grass as fodder mostly grows abundantly and allows for cattle grazers to collect cattle feed.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

The above purposes could largely be met even if all or most of the lake were a green wetland, not a blue water body. Birds and reptiles prefer the wetlands for nesting and stay in there for large parts of the day. There are fishes and other biodiversity in the wetland.

The green in the wetlands possibly increases the oxygen levels in the surrounding areas too. The nutrient in the waste water is drawn out by the plants that grow in the wetland and hence the water leaving the wetland is a lot cleaner.

We can’t swim, bathe, fish, wash in the lake. A green wetland serves almost all and more of the purposes that a blue water body can, except for changes in aesthetics and some changes in volume. We are increasingly looking at lakes as being receptacles for treated/untreated waste water. We are also struggling to maintain our STPs in the long term.

Now, what if we imagined more of our lakes as wetlands and not water bodies? Wetlands would serve almost all the functions that the current water body does and additionally allow for better water treatment. Currently most lakes have 1/8 to 1/4 of the total area as a wetland, either by design and maintenance or by the propensity of the wetland to take over.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

It does seem a lot more practical and long-term, and realistic to imagine our lakes as green wetlands. This could mean that more of the lake area could turn green or perhaps some lakes could turn completely into wetlands too. The wetland would still need maintenance, management and acceptance, and we would need to learn how to go about with it.

Would we be fine having a small change in our outlook, to change the imagination of a water body as a green wetland?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pallikaranai Marsh’s Zone of Influence: Threat or shield for South Chennai?

Pallikaranai Marsh acts as a buffer against Chennai floods. Protecting homes and ecology around it needs a proper ZoI, not weak rules.

Every monsoon, South Chennai goes underwater. The only sponge that soaks up all that rain is the Pallikaranai Marsh, yet around it, 8,619 hectares of land face severe flood risks. Despite this, the State has offered to protect only a fraction of that land.  On October 9th, the Tamil Nadu State Wetlands Authority (TNSWA) told the Madras High Court  that the marsh's interim Zone of Influence (ZoI) is just 36 survey numbers, covering 128.19 hectares. The next hearing of the case is on November 11th.  Scattered "protection"  These plots lie in bits and pieces across seven villages, from Pallikaranai to Perumbakkam.…

Similar Story

Blocked Kovalam-Nemmeli wetland channels risk disaster for South Chennai; Conservationists urge action  

Barriers built for the Mamallan Reservoir block Buckingham Canal water flow, vital to keep the wetland alive, avoid floods and sustain fishing families.

In Chengalpattu district, the main water channels of the Kovalam-Nemmeli coastal wetland, which drains a catchment of more than 270 square kilometres, have currently been blocked. Barriers that obstruct water flow have been built across Chennai's Buckingham Canal at three places: Thiruvidanthai-Vadanemmeli, near the Nemmeli-Thiruporur bridge, and Saluvankuppam. Earlier, we explored how the Mamallan Reservoir causes serious damage to the wetland’s ecology and how fishing livelihoods are affected. Field investigations by the Wetland Conservation Network have recorded the blockages preventing tidal exchange in the Buckingham Canal.           According to officials, these barriers were put up to enable construction of the Mamallan…