Lake isn’t just a blue water body, it’s a green wetland

Popular imagination of a lake has pristine blue water, walking tracks and jogging tracks. But in Bengaluru the ideal image of the lake isn't practically possible.

Our preferred imagination of an urban lake is mostly blue water with a well-maintained walking track all along, some trees on the periphery and some birds on them. That imagination is of course broken when the lake stinks, froths, has plastic strewn around. And when we see overgrown typha reeds in the lake, floating hyacinth and alligator weed, when the lake turns from blue to green, that imagination is broken. And then we want to rejuvenate the lake and turn it blue again.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

If we were to step back and think why is it that we really want the blue, or water, we realise a couple of things. These lakes we re man-made, created for purposes of flood control, irrigation, fishing, live stock and domestic purposes. However in most urban lakes, especially the smaller ones, even if the water were of good quality,

– We are not allowed to swim or bathe
– We are not allowed to fish unless we are a fishing contractor (with permissions from the fisheries department)
– We are not allowed to row a boat
– We are not allowed to immerse idols or other offerings. Immersions are to be made in a Kalyani that is specifically made for the purpose

Lakes continue to serve the below purposes:

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

– Lakes act as a flood control mechanism when the streams connect to the lake (and the flows are not obstructed)
– Lakes allow for groundwater recharge and places nearer the lake do observe an increase in ground water tables.
– Lakes help regulate temperature. The area around a lake is always much cooler 
– Lake is a pleasant place to walk around/socialise 
– Lake provides spaces for birds, reptiles and other living beings to breed and nest
– Lake is a place where societies/governments let in their treated/untreated waste water
– Lake is a place where grass as fodder mostly grows abundantly and allows for cattle grazers to collect cattle feed.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

The above purposes could largely be met even if all or most of the lake were a green wetland, not a blue water body. Birds and reptiles prefer the wetlands for nesting and stay in there for large parts of the day. There are fishes and other biodiversity in the wetland.

The green in the wetlands possibly increases the oxygen levels in the surrounding areas too. The nutrient in the waste water is drawn out by the plants that grow in the wetland and hence the water leaving the wetland is a lot cleaner.

We can’t swim, bathe, fish, wash in the lake. A green wetland serves almost all and more of the purposes that a blue water body can, except for changes in aesthetics and some changes in volume. We are increasingly looking at lakes as being receptacles for treated/untreated waste water. We are also struggling to maintain our STPs in the long term.

Now, what if we imagined more of our lakes as wetlands and not water bodies? Wetlands would serve almost all the functions that the current water body does and additionally allow for better water treatment. Currently most lakes have 1/8 to 1/4 of the total area as a wetland, either by design and maintenance or by the propensity of the wetland to take over.

Lower Ambalipura lake / wetland

It does seem a lot more practical and long-term, and realistic to imagine our lakes as green wetlands. This could mean that more of the lake area could turn green or perhaps some lakes could turn completely into wetlands too. The wetland would still need maintenance, management and acceptance, and we would need to learn how to go about with it.

Would we be fine having a small change in our outlook, to change the imagination of a water body as a green wetland?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Buckingham Canal restoration: Stuck between ambitious proposals and financial constraints

Buckingham Canal in Chennai, vital for flood control and ecology, faces neglect, pollution and halted restoration due to funding challenges

It has been over two centuries since the construction of the Buckingham Canal, a once vital navigational route stretching from Pedda Ganjam in Andhra Pradesh to Marakkanam in Tamil Nadu. At its peak, the canal could carry 5,600 cubic feet per second (cusecs) of water. However, decades of unplanned urbanisation have drastically reduced its capacity to just 2,850 cusecs with the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) being the major encroacher. Map: Shanthala Ramesh Regular desilting is crucial for maintaining the Buckingham Canal, yet its upkeep has been a significant challenge since the early 20th century. Over the years, numerous proposals…

Similar Story

Panje wetlands: Greens continue their fight against all odds

Despite a long struggle by environmentalists, the Panje wetlands in Uran are drying up. A look at the reasons for this and what activists face.

“Panchhi nadiya pawan ke jhonke, koi sarhad na inhe roke…”  (Birds can fly where they want/ water can take its course/ the wind blows in every direction/ no barrier can stop them) — thus go the Javed Akhtar penned lyrics of the song from the movie Refugee (2000, J. P Dutta). As I read about the Panje wetlands in Uran, I wondered if these lyrics hold true today, when human interference is wreaking such havoc on natural environments, and keeping these very elements out. But then, I also wondered if I should refer to Panje, a 289-hectare inter-tidal zone, as…