Affordable transport should be a fundamental right, says forum

Proposed fare structure: Rs.5 for the first 10 kms Rs.10 for 10-20 kms and Rs.15 for any distance above 20 kms.

On February 8th, 2014, Bangalore Bus Prayaanikara Vedike, an organisation of bus commuters and civil society organizations, organised a planning meeting to discuss a campaign for affordable bus services in Bangalore. This was organised in response to the steep rise in bus fares over the last year and a half to almost 50%, increasing the economic hardship for Bangaloreans.

If a garment worker or a pourakarmika, who earns Rs. 5,000 a month, buys a monthly pass for Rs. 725 (Rs. 925 for red board buses), she shells out 15-20% of her income just for commuting, which increases if more people in the family use the bus. Many people are now cutting their health and education expenses to be able to commute in the city. In fact, from February 2nd, fares for non air-conditioned buses have been hiked by Re. 1 for the 2nd Stage, citing rising diesel prices.

Bangalore Bus Prayaanikara Vedike (BBPV) was formed in 2013 in response to the steep fare hikes by BMTC in June 2013. The Vedike has been campaigning for better BMTC services including reduced fares. While there have been positive responses from BMTC on some fronts, the management has summarily rejected the rollback of fares, despite many discussions, petitions and protests.

At the meeting it was discussed that these fare hikes only signify BMTC’s obsession with profits. Public transport is an essential service, and the right to public transport exists independent of profitability. The affordability of a service determines how many people can use it, and access to public transport cannot depend on diesel prices and profits for BMTC. Many other cities and towns across the country are running bus services at more affordable rates, and there are cities across the world which even provide free public bus services. It is possible for Bangalore to imagine a subsidized affordable bus service, where commuters are not at the mercy of administrative inefficiencies and rising diesel prices.

H S Sudhira, a researcher at Gubbi Labs, spoke about how the current mechanism of fare fixation should be revoked, and the government should provide subsidies to offset any operational losses, and access to Majestic area should be improved. Dasarathi, a campaigner for public transport, spoke about how BMTC’s financing priorities were completely skewed, and how it spent crores of rupees on buildings, which could be spent on expanding the bus fleet.

He also stated that the expenditure on the Metro is unnecessary, and simply expanding the bus fleet and improving bus services, would significantly improve the transport situation, at a much less cost.

Nagaraj, of KSRTC Employees Union, spoke about how BMTC treats its employees poorly, and how corruption was endemic in the Corporation, and pilferage also contributed to BMTC’s failing finances.

The meeting was also attended by PGR Sindhia, the former transport minister of Karnataka, who also headed the Legislature-appointed Sindhia committee in 1993 which examined KSRTC’s operations and explored the rationale behind fare hikes. The committee had concluded that there was no need for a fare hike if administrative inefficiencies in the Corporation were taken care off, and proper maintenance of vehicles was done. Sindhia, at the meeting, stated that Bangalore needed an inclusive transport system, and the bus system was crucial to establishing such inclusivity.

The meeting was concluded with a proposed fare structure, in which passengers would pay Rs. 5 for the first ten kilometers, Rs. 10 for ten to twenty kilometers, and Rs. 15 for any distance above 20 kilometres. It was proposed that a daily pass should be for Rs. 25, and a monthly pass should be for Rs. 250, which was 5% of the Government’s minimum wages. Persons below the minimum wage should be given free bus passes.

Contact:

122/4, Infantry Road, Bangalore: 560001
Email: bbpvedike@gmail.com
Phone: 9880595032, 9632223460, 9449399729

Related Articles

With fare hike, BMTC helps people maintain better health!
Stage distance <2km: BMTC ends up charging higher ticket fare
BMTC fare hike is irrational
Meeting to question BMTC’s fare hike

Comments:

  1. Mahesh Gowda says:

    excellent and absolutely necessary proposal!
    bmtc needs to explain how much it has spent on TTMCs & other buildings and how much they have earned from it and also how essential they were!

    i would also request citizenmatters to get us info about pricing of bus travel in other cities and if possible diesel prices at those cities too

  2. Balasubramanian A. says:

    Very good coverage of BMTC. It is stange the Government is ready to spend huge amonts on so many freebees from Rice to Laptops, but they talk Profit and Loss when it comes to public transport. In an expanding Metropolis like Bangalore the common people have to travel long distances for earning their livelihood. There is no law in our Country compelling the employers for free accommodation and transport. Even the public Sector undertakings which used to have fleets of Buses have discontinued. Under the circumstances there should be fresh thinking on this subject.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Effective speed management critical in India to reduce road crash fatalities

Speeding accounts for over 71% of crash-related fatalities on Indian roads. Continuous monitoring and focussed action are a must.

Four hundred and twenty people continue to lose their lives on Indian roads every single day. In 2022, India recorded 4.43 lakh road crashes, resulting in the death of 1.63 lakh people. Vulnerable road-users like pedestrians, bicyclists and two-wheelers riders comprised 67% of the deceased. Road crashes also pose an economic burden, costing the exchequer 3.14% of India’s GDP annually.  These figures underscore the urgent need for effective interventions, aligned with global good practices. Sweden's Vision Zero road safety policy, adopted in 1997, focussed on modifying infrastructure to protect road users from unacceptable levels of risk and led to a…

Similar Story

Many roadblocks to getting a PUC certificate for your vehicle

Under new rule, vehicles owners have to pay heavy fines if they fail to get a pollution test done. But, the system to get a PUC certificate remains flawed.

Recently, there’s been news that the new traffic challan system will mandate a Rs 10,000 penalty on old or new vehicles if owners don't acquire the Pollution Under Control (PUC) certification on time. To tackle expired certificates, the system will use CCTV surveillance to identify non-compliant vehicles and flag them for blacklisting from registration. The rule ultimately has several drawbacks, given the difficulty in acquiring PUC certificates in the first place. The number of PUC centres in Chennai has reduced drastically with only a handful still operational. Only the petrol bunk-owned PUC centres charge the customers based on the tariff…