Public object to partnership with CII on draft waste management rules

CII, an industry body, organised the government consultation programme. This attracted the dissent of the public and NGOs working in Bengaluru in the field of waste management.

Consultation on Draft Waste Management Rules-2015. Pic courtest: ESG.

The stakeholders consultation on Draft Waste Management Rules 2015 which was arranged by the Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) in the city on Friday, was called off as the public who were present raised objection over Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) sponsoring the consultation programme.

The programme witnessed heated arguments between the public, officials from MoEF and office-bearers of CII. Leo Saldanha from Environment Support Group (ESG) took exception to the CII sponsoring consultation of a draft proposed by the government.

“As per the constitutional provisions, the programme should have been organised by the government or any government agency rather outsourcing it to a lobbying group for industries like CII,” he said and questioned the legal sanctity of a consultation sponsored by a private organisation.

Citizens and representatives from NGOs flayed the Ministry for organising the consultation without extending them the invitation and not issuing public notice. “Is it that you wanted only the representatives from industries to participate?” a NGO member asked.

Srinivas, panchayat member from Mavallipura, while explaining the sad state of affairs of the village due to garbage landfill sites, asked why the consultation programme was organised in a such a place (Le Meridien hotel) where free entry for common man is restricted.

MoEF Joint Secretary Bishwanath Sinha though tried to convince the public, his attempts went futile. In fact, the officer could not give a clear answer as to why the Ministry has partnered with CII. At one point, he said the programme was open for all and then he went on to say that the consultation was for industrialists only as they are the main stakeholders. “The programme was originally meant for industries, but when we were approached by a few public who asked if they can attend the programme, I decided to make it open for all,” he clarified.

He added that the Ministry had decided to organise the consultation in partnership with Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industries (FICCI) and Confederation of Indian Industries (CII). “We have 550 days time before finalising the Rule and we intend to convene separate stakeholder meetings with public,” Sinha assured. However, he refused to pay heed to demand of the NGOs to oust CII from partnership. He called off the meeting.

Majority of the invitees were from industries such as automobile, cement, who had come from Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Stakeholder consultations have been already held in Delhi and Mumbai.

Related Articles

Tell BDA it is unconstitutional for them to plan Bengaluru: ESG
Look who BBMP signed up to process waste in Bengaluru
How your apartment complex can be a waste-free zone
Lessons in e-waste management

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Uthandi’s ₹91-crore ‘flood drain’: Is Chennai solving one problem by creating another?

The WRD's flood fix puts Uthandi at risk. Residents flag pollution, CRZ violations, aquifer damage, and threats to nearby fishing livelihoods.

The Straight-cut Flood Escape Channel project at Uthandi in the southern part of Chennai along East Coast Road was conceived by the Water Resources Department (WRD) as a flood mitigation measure, with a budget of ₹91 crores. The plan proposes a cut-and-cover drain through the VGP Layout in Uthandi, to connect the Buckingham Canal to the Bay of Bengal. The drain is supposedly meant to divert excess floodwater in Buckingham Canal during heavy rains, when areas around the Pallikaranai marsh and Okkiyam Madavu face flooding.  Work on the project started immediately after its inauguration in August 2025. However, residents of…

Similar Story

CIDCO’s new flamingo study raises questions on Navi Mumbai airport safety, wetland future

The Bombay Natural History Society had earlier pointed out that protecting wetlands and ensuring aviation safety should go hand in hand.

The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO)'s decision to appoint Australian aviation consultancy Avisure to study bird movement around the Navi Mumbai International Airport has raised fresh questions about the future of Navi Mumbai's wetlands. The agency has cited the ongoing study as grounds to defer legal protection for DPS Flamingo Lake, arguing that no irreversible decision should be taken until the assessment of bird-related aviation risks is complete. But bird movement around the airport is not being studied for the first time. Findings of BNHS More than a decade ago, the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) was…