Building Namma Metro: What it takes

BMRCL Chief N Sivasailam, talked about Bangalore Metro and its challenges in a new IIM(B) discussion series. He promised accountability issues will be tackled in Phase II.

"I am sure I have answers to all your questions but I can’t guarantee satisfaction," said a candid N Sivasailam, MD of Bangalore Metro Rail Company Limited (BMRCL), in his opening remarks. He was conversing with Dr Ashwin Mahesh at a discussion on the Namma Metro at IIM, Bangalore, as part of a series on ‘Practice in Public Spaces’, on January 30th.

The first session of the series ‘Practice in Public Spaces’. K Jayraj sets the agenda. N Sivasailam is seated on the front row (in a black jacket). Pic: Shamala Kittane

The discussion series was initiated by K Jayraj, a senior fellow at IIMB and ex-BBMP commissioner. Rajeev Gowda, Professor, IIMB appreciates the initiative, "India is solely lacking in documenting initiatives that involve public spaces and governance." The series aims to address this deficit. The monthly sessions are meant to record experiences of people that are key to managing large projects that affect public spaces to understand how they function and all the management that goes into realising such complex projects.

Jayraj set the agenda of the discussion to cover involvement by stakeholders – the centre and state, what it takes to abate and resolve controversies (land acquisition, the statue of a National leader, trees"), budget allocation and co-ordination, design issues (like the frequently asked – did Metro mess up MG road?) and displacement and rehabilitation.

Sivasailam focused on the internal management of BMRCL and financial aspects in his presentation and later responded to audience questions.

Sivasailam informed that BMRCL has won all 350 public interest litigations filed against them. They have also managed to provide housing facilities for slum dwellers displaced due to Metro, this has apparently helped reduce alcoholism rates and even domestic abuse cases.

Sivasailam brought up the issue of bad roads as a result of Metro work, when questioned about Metro’s interaction with the government.

Board shows project details of Metro construction between Shivashankar Circle and R V road. It mentions an end date of June 2011. RITES Consultant engineer Kiran Kumar said the project may complete by 2014 and. It is also dependent on the underground Metro construction happening near M N Krishna Rao Park. Pic: Shamala Kittane.

Any infrastructure project involves close interaction with BBMP and the sheer magnitude of the city’s largest infrastructure project makes the dealing with the corporation a daily business.

"If people are complaining about bad roads as a result of Metro work, then we expect the municipal authority’s support – it is a struggle between the two of us since it’s also fair for them to say — we dug up the roads so we need to repair it." said Sivasailam. Accountability will be included at the policy level in the Metro phase-2 project plans to avoid such issues, he added. The question of who will fix the current set of bad roads where Metro work is currently happening remained unanswered.

It is not Metro’s job to provide for parking spaces argued Sivasailam, "it is an ‘institutional confusion’", which will be eliminated in framing a clear policy for Metro phase-II.

‘Sorry for the inconvenience’ and no path for pedestrian movement. Pic: Shamala Kittane

The operation costs of the Metro will be covered if 30% of ‘Peak Hour Peak Distance Traffic (PHPDT)’ opts for Metro commute. Tickets are priced at Rs. 10 per station and a discount of 15% are offered for the ‘Metro card holders’ plus an additional 10% discount for point-to-point travel.

The Metro MD explained the reason for adopting rail-traction over overhead traction — rail traction is more aesthetic and avoids the clutter of overhead wires and associated tree felling.

Sivasailam responded to questions on the MG Road boulevard, "it was used as a place for ablutions. Even if it did look beautiful, it was dirty. Metro will turn this into a better space that a future generation might want to protect". At MG Road, the metro could not go underground, as it is technically not feasible. An underground rail needs a 800 metre ramp to enter and exit, and this is not available for exit after MG Road and the whole eastern line would have to go underground for this to be possible – this means a huge resource and financial allocation.

Projects like the Metro that spans over many years impacts the city in complex ways – it becomes the imposing background of somebody’s childhood, the loss of a tree lined road could be the loss of a cherished pace, a new tin-home to a young labourer couple from another part of the country. Kudos to IIMB in taking that small step towards the much needed effort of documenting public spaces.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…