Pollution board says data from Bengaluru air quality monitoring study is incorrect

Instruments used to measure instant values of air pollution are not certified, so the data is unreliable, says KSPCB.

The Karnataka State Pollution Control Board has issued the following rejoinder on 22nd February to the press release by Climate Trends, on the air quality data monitoring exercise, published on 19th February.

[Update] On 23rd February, the team behind the study, Climate Trends and Co Media Lab issued an addendum to clarify the points made in KSPCB’s statement below. 

On 21st February 2018, Co- Media Lab and Climate Trends have released the report on air quality of Bengaluru City, where it is reported that there are huge gaps in the KSPCB data on the smaller particulate matter ( PM 2.5). In the report, Particulate Matter Levels of PM1o and PM2.5 levels are reported in the range of 74 μg/m3 to 858.5 μg/m3 and 32.5 μg/m3 to 193.5 μg/m3 respectively. The said agencies have monitored during 5th Feb to 15th Feb 2018, the particulate matter PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels between 8:30 AM and 10:30 AM using Laser based Airveda equipment of Ghaziabad India, which is not approved by any certifying agency.

In this regard, the following clarifications are issued in the public interest.

To measure different air pollutants levels in ambient air, the MoEF 8.CC, Government of India under Environment Protection Act 1986 is notified vide No SO 384(E) dated 18th November 2009.In the notification methods prescribed for measurement for PM10 and PM2.5 are as follows,

  Name of the Pollutant Methods of measurement
1 Parliculate matter (size
less than 10 pm) or PM16
pg/M3
1. Gravimetric method
2. Tapered element oscillating microbalance (TOEM)
3. Beta-ray attenuation and technique
2 Parliculate matter (size
less than 2.5 pm) or
PMz s pglM3
1. Gravimetric method
2. Tapered element oscillating microbalance (TOEM)
3. Beta-ray attenuation and technique

The above said methodologies are being followed for the measurement of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5 ) by the regulatory bodies in the entire Country viz., all State Pollution Control Boards. The CPCB has published the protocols involving the above said methods for monitoring of pollutants particulate matter in India. In these protocols, calibration, periodicity and data verification is well documented and issued the directions to all State Pollution Control Board’s to follow the same methods of measurement of Air pollutants.

The Board is monitoring the air pollution level in Karnataka as per the CPCB/MoEF&CC protocols or guidelines. Hence the monitored data by the Board is correct, reliable and indisputable.

However, some universities and national companies have started manufacturing low cost equipments without obtaining approval from the competent authority. These equipment are not approved, tested, validated and certified by any National or International agency institutes like National Physical Laboratory-Delhi, Indian Standards Organisation (ISO), United States – Environment Protection Agency (US-EPA), Monitoring Certification Scheme (MCERTS) UK and TUV Rheinland (Germany) etc.

Hence the organisations measured the particulate levels in Bangalore city without following the MoEF &CC notified protocols. These equipment and methodologies are of not approved by the competent authority. Therefore the data reported by the organisations viz., Co-Media Lab and Climate Trends on 21.2.2018 is incorrect. The media should not publish unreliable reports which do not follow standard protocols as notified by MoEF&CC, Government of India and mislead the general public.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Commuters, vendors bear the brunt of rising air pollution in Chennai’s Ambattur

IIT-M’s Project Kaatru finds high PM2.5 levels at Ambattur Estate, Padi flyover and Dairy Road, exposing residents to dust and pollution daily.

Commuters passing through Ambattur Industrial Estate inevitably find a layer of dust coating their vehicles, faces, and hands. For Lalitha*, a domestic worker employed at a high-rise apartment near Padi flyover’s Saravana Stores, the last two weeks of December have been especially unbearable. "Dust, dust, dust everywhere," she says, coughing through a persistent cold. At 6 pm, when the rush hour begins, it takes her nearly 30 minutes by bus to cover the 5 km journey home. The ride to the Dunlop area is punctuated by pollution, blaring horns, and endless traffic snarls. “It should take 15 minutes usually, but…

Similar Story

முதல்வர் சீக்கிரம் அடிக்கல் நாட்ட வேண்டும் என்பதற்காக அறிவியல்  ஆய்வுகளைப் புறந்தள்ளுவதா?

CRZ clearance has been granted for a new drinking water reservoir in the naturally formed coastal salt marshes in Chengalpattu near Chennai.

செங்கல்பட்டு மாவட்டம், திருப்போரூர் மற்றும் திருக்கழுக்குன்றம் வட்டங்களுக்குட்பட்ட வருவாய் கிராமங்களில், இயற்கையாக அமைந்துள்ள கழுவேலி, உப்பங்கழி நீர்நிலையில், புதிய குடிநீர் நீர்த்தேக்கம் அமைக்க CRZ அனுமதி வழங்கியுள்ளது மாநில கடற்கரை ஒழுங்குமுறை மண்டல ஆணையம். இத்திட்டத்தின் முதல் கட்டத்தில் நெம்மேலி, கிருஷ்ணகாரனை, தண்டலம், பட்டிபுலம், திருப்போரூர், மாமல்லபுரம், சலுவான்குப்பம், பையனூர் ஆகிய வருவாய் கிராமங்களுக்குட்பட்ட 4375 ஏக்கர் பரப்பளவில் வருவாய்த்துறை, நீர்வளத்துறைக்குச் சொந்தமான இடங்களில் நீர்த்தேக்கம் அமைக்கத் திட்டமிடப்பட்டுள்ளது. 1.655TMC கொள்ளளவு கொண்ட இந்நீர்த்தேக்கம் மேற்கூறிய கிராமங்களைச் சேர்ந்த 50 ஆயிரத்துக்கும் மேற்பட்ட மக்களின் குடிநீர்த் தேவையைப் பூர்த்தி செய்யும் எனவும் அருகாமை கிராமங்களின் வெள்ள பாதிப்பைக் குறைக்கும் எனவும் அரசுத் தரப்பில் கூறப்படுகிறது. Map showing components of the Kovalam reservoir. Pic courtesy: Tamil Nadu Water Resources Department. இத்திட்டத்திற்கான விண்ணப்பத்தை 17.11.2025 அன்று  தொழில் நுட்ப  வல்லுநர் குழு பரிசீலித்தது. 20.11.2025 அன்று  மாநில கடற்கரை  மண்டல ஆணையம் விண்ணப்பத்தைை பரிசீலித்து CRZ அனுமதிக்கு பரிந்துரைக்கிறது.…