Crackdown begins on unregistered childrens’ homes in Bengaluru

Child trafficking is a growing concern, because of which the Supreme Court asked the governments to identify unregistered childcare homes. As a result, crackdown has begun on such foster homes in Bengaluru.

In spite of the Supreme Court’s recent order to shut down unregistered children’s homes, the ones in Bengaluru may stay open until the end of the academic year 2016.

The Supreme Court, on 11th September 2015, directed the Centre and state governments to shut down all children’s homes run by unregistered NGOs, saying many of these centres had become hubs for child trafficking.

“Closing them down is not very easy. We have to give them time, to make repairs and improve,” said Divya Narayanappa, district child protection officer, Bengaluru.

“We can’t disrupt the children’s academic year. And it is difficult to rehabilitate them in a new place once it is shut down.”

“We have made our observations to them and they should carry out the guidelines. Till March/April next year if they don’t meet our guidelines, we will have to shut them down obviously,” Divya Narayanappa said.

The Court asked the states to make arrangements in registered homes for the displaced children.

Narayanappa said that if any of these homes are shut down, the parents will be asked to take their children back or they will be shifted to other active homes. The financial implications also have to be worked out, she added.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2000 stipulates that the scheme should support the creation of new institutional facilities and the maintenance of existing institutional facilities for both children in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection. This includes shelter homes, children’s homes and observation homes, special homes and places of safety.

The Vathsalya Charitable Trust, whose registration has been marked as rejected on the government website, claims otherwise.

“We’re in dialogue with the government. We’d like to see what they mean by this,” said Mary Paul, executive director of Vathsalya Charitable Trust. “We were an adoption centre before… We have closed down adoption now; we’re running a day-care program and have nothing to do with the residential care of children.”

“We are taking this seriously,” said Prem Kumari, project director, Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS). She said that the institutions are sending their proposals for registration and district officers have been asked to look into them. If institutions refuse to get registered, ICPS will shut them down.

“To be honest, the situation in Bengaluru is very difficult,” Kumari said. “Some organisations don’t even put up boards; it is difficult to even identify which institutions are running. They work on a very small scale basis, undetected.”

Kumari said that children in unregistered homes will be shifted to registered institutes.

Karnataka has 129 foster homes. Out of these, the website of Department of Women and Child Welfare, Karnataka showed the registration of 13 homes as rejected, 29 as withheld and 87 as ‘under processing’. However, at the time of publishing this article, the links were inactive.

If you see an unregistered childrens’ home, here is where you can lodge your complaint: Department of Women and Child Welfare, Karnataka

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…