Crackdown begins on unregistered childrens’ homes in Bengaluru

Child trafficking is a growing concern, because of which the Supreme Court asked the governments to identify unregistered childcare homes. As a result, crackdown has begun on such foster homes in Bengaluru.

In spite of the Supreme Court’s recent order to shut down unregistered children’s homes, the ones in Bengaluru may stay open until the end of the academic year 2016.

The Supreme Court, on 11th September 2015, directed the Centre and state governments to shut down all children’s homes run by unregistered NGOs, saying many of these centres had become hubs for child trafficking.

“Closing them down is not very easy. We have to give them time, to make repairs and improve,” said Divya Narayanappa, district child protection officer, Bengaluru.

“We can’t disrupt the children’s academic year. And it is difficult to rehabilitate them in a new place once it is shut down.”

“We have made our observations to them and they should carry out the guidelines. Till March/April next year if they don’t meet our guidelines, we will have to shut them down obviously,” Divya Narayanappa said.

The Court asked the states to make arrangements in registered homes for the displaced children.

Narayanappa said that if any of these homes are shut down, the parents will be asked to take their children back or they will be shifted to other active homes. The financial implications also have to be worked out, she added.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2000 stipulates that the scheme should support the creation of new institutional facilities and the maintenance of existing institutional facilities for both children in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection. This includes shelter homes, children’s homes and observation homes, special homes and places of safety.

The Vathsalya Charitable Trust, whose registration has been marked as rejected on the government website, claims otherwise.

“We’re in dialogue with the government. We’d like to see what they mean by this,” said Mary Paul, executive director of Vathsalya Charitable Trust. “We were an adoption centre before… We have closed down adoption now; we’re running a day-care program and have nothing to do with the residential care of children.”

“We are taking this seriously,” said Prem Kumari, project director, Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS). She said that the institutions are sending their proposals for registration and district officers have been asked to look into them. If institutions refuse to get registered, ICPS will shut them down.

“To be honest, the situation in Bengaluru is very difficult,” Kumari said. “Some organisations don’t even put up boards; it is difficult to even identify which institutions are running. They work on a very small scale basis, undetected.”

Kumari said that children in unregistered homes will be shifted to registered institutes.

Karnataka has 129 foster homes. Out of these, the website of Department of Women and Child Welfare, Karnataka showed the registration of 13 homes as rejected, 29 as withheld and 87 as ‘under processing’. However, at the time of publishing this article, the links were inactive.

If you see an unregistered childrens’ home, here is where you can lodge your complaint: Department of Women and Child Welfare, Karnataka

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…