All you need to know about Ward 21 – Hebbal

by August 19, 2015 Governance
What are the complaints bothering Hebbala voters? How much money was spent in the ward? What were the works done?

21 – Hebbala

Sitting corporator is recontesting from Hebbal ward. While all wards generally see an increase in voters’ numbers, this has reduced from what it was during 2010 elections. More information on this ward follows:

MLA (2013): R Jagadeesh Kumar (BJP), Hebbal
MP (2014): D V Sadananda Gowda (BJP), Bangalore North

BBMP 2010

Corporator: C.R. Jayappa Reddy (BJP)
#1, Manjunatha Nilaya, 287 E, Near Bus Stand, Cholanayakanahalli, Bangalore-3. Ph: 9243100746
Reservation: G

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 23.8
Winner’s margin: 3049
Total votes polled: 12687
Total voters: 27970

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 26448
Male: 13724
Female: 12722
Others: 2

Reserved: General

Contesting Candidates

BJP: Jayappa Reddy
INC: Anand Kumar
JDS: Kiran Kumar
BSP: Narayana Swamy
Independent: Vinay Garuda, Hanumantharaya Gowda, C M Narayanaswamy

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 32516
  • Households: 8181
  • Area: 1.2 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 383 km
  • Lakes: 0, Total area: 0 sq km
  • Parks: 10, Total area: 1.3 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 4, Total area: 1.3 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

More information on candidates

There are no candidates contesting the BBMP elections- 2015 from this ward, whose information is available with Citizen Matters. If you do not find a particular candidate on this page, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It may not be from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

Ward information – Ward 93: Vasanth Nagar
All you need to know about Ward 45 – Malleshwaram
All you need to know about Ward 19 – Sanjay Nagar
‘Cash for coverage’ comes to BBMP elections too
BBMP Elections 2015: Special coverage by Citizen Matters

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

by March 30, 2026 Governance
As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Continue reading

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

by , and March 19, 2026 Governance
Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…

Continue reading