Multi-storeyed buildings could do without chutes

In response to BBMP's seeking of suggestions on disposing solid waste, Arathi points that apartments should opt for managing the waste themselves.

It is now time to revive the age old procedure of building action plan. Here are some guidelines which can be implemented.

1. In multi-storied buildings, garbage chutes need to be banned, to enforce segregation at source. In buildings that already have chutes, they should be closed. In new buildings, chutes should not be approved during the plan sanction.

2. All multi-storied buildings should provide a garbage sorting area along with a composting area. If there is insufficient space at ground level, terrace/ topmost floor/ basement can be considered. It has been found that the terrace (or top most floor) is an ideal location for composting. It should also be ensured that the space is approved by the fire department.

3. In case of multi-storied buildings – for sanitary waste, a more economical option than the existing ones provided by waste management firms like Maridi or Ramky should be made available.

4. Slums should be provided with door-to-door garbage collection.

5. Leaf litter and garden waste from independent houses should be composted at the nearest park. Burning of leaf waste should be prohibited. Sweepers, pourkarmikas or supervisors need to undergo training and education about this.

6. Ban plastic bags or charging for plastic bags by shops, needs to be strictly enforced.

7. Penalties for throwing garbage and debris into lakes, storm water drains, rajakaluves, and other water bodies should be imposed and strictly enforced.

Comments:

  1. oli offl says:

    Interesting perspective! Eliminating chutes in multi-storeyed buildings could encourage residents to adopt better waste segregation habits, ultimately leading to more sustainable waste management practices. However, it’s worth considering how we balance convenience with responsibility to ensure everyone adapts to the change seamlessly.

  2. Thank you so much for sharing this information. It is very useful information for Businesses.

  3. eco peb says:

    Great Article! Very informative

  4. Metfraa says:

    Good Initiative

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Peripheral Ring Road: Bengaluru farmers allege unfair payouts threaten their future

Started two decades ago, Bengaluru’s PRR project leaves farmers distressed, as unfair compensation risks loss of land and livelihoods.

The Peripheral Ring Road project, once announced as a development that could benefit farmers, has, over time, turned into a burden. In a recent article, we examined how the project may lead to the displacement of farmers. The project, delayed for almost two decades and now rebranded as the Bengaluru Business Corridor, has caused farmers and landowners considerable suffering. Unable to sell or mortgage their lands, some landowners face significant financial distress. With the unavailability of affordable and fertile lands, farmers will now be forced to migrate. However, the concerns of the farmers and landowners are pressing: they believe that…

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s Peripheral Ring Road: Two decades on, who really benefits?

The Bengaluru Business Corridor project risks displacing farmers and affecting land value, continuing the twenty-year struggle.

Krishna Ramesh, a farmer from Kachamaranahalli village, 21 km from the centre of Bengaluru, has lived under the shadow of a land acquisition notice since 2007. His five acres, the only land he owns, are among 2,558 acres notified for the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) project, now rebranded as the Bengaluru Business Corridor. The land sustains his family, yielding over ₹1 lakh a month. If the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), the project’s planning authority, proceeds with the acquisition, Krishna, who is also the General Secretary of PRR Raitha and Niveshannadharara Sangha, will be left landless—his livelihood dismantled, his future uprooted.…