Multi-storeyed buildings could do without chutes

In response to BBMP's seeking of suggestions on disposing solid waste, Arathi points that apartments should opt for managing the waste themselves.

It is now time to revive the age old procedure of building action plan. Here are some guidelines which can be implemented.

1. In multi-storied buildings, garbage chutes need to be banned, to enforce segregation at source. In buildings that already have chutes, they should be closed. In new buildings, chutes should not be approved during the plan sanction.

2. All multi-storied buildings should provide a garbage sorting area along with a composting area. If there is insufficient space at ground level, terrace/ topmost floor/ basement can be considered. It has been found that the terrace (or top most floor) is an ideal location for composting. It should also be ensured that the space is approved by the fire department.

3. In case of multi-storied buildings – for sanitary waste, a more economical option than the existing ones provided by waste management firms like Maridi or Ramky should be made available.

4. Slums should be provided with door-to-door garbage collection.

5. Leaf litter and garden waste from independent houses should be composted at the nearest park. Burning of leaf waste should be prohibited. Sweepers, pourkarmikas or supervisors need to undergo training and education about this.

6. Ban plastic bags or charging for plastic bags by shops, needs to be strictly enforced.

7. Penalties for throwing garbage and debris into lakes, storm water drains, rajakaluves, and other water bodies should be imposed and strictly enforced.

Comments:

  1. oli offl says:

    Interesting perspective! Eliminating chutes in multi-storeyed buildings could encourage residents to adopt better waste segregation habits, ultimately leading to more sustainable waste management practices. However, it’s worth considering how we balance convenience with responsibility to ensure everyone adapts to the change seamlessly.

  2. Thank you so much for sharing this information. It is very useful information for Businesses.

  3. eco peb says:

    Great Article! Very informative

  4. Metfraa says:

    Good Initiative

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s flood alert system: Good for rescue, not prevention

Cities like Agartala use the system to prevent floods, but factors including low drain capacity make this difficult in Bengaluru.

Bengaluru's flooding story often circles around its age-old stormwater drainage system conflicting with rapid urbanisation. The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has been actively utilising data from flood alert systems, but only for rescue and evacuation, and not for mapping flood patterns or preventing floods. Also, though the data is publicly accessible, little is being done to create public awareness about it.  “I was stuck in a traffic jam three kilometres away from my office in Manyata Tech Park when I got an office alert about inundation there. If only flooding information was timely and accessible, it would save so…

Similar Story

Retaining walls fail to provide flood respite for Mumbai’s riverbank residents

Retaining walls, built to prevent Mumbai’s rivers from overflowing during monsoons, have not changed much for residents staying along the Dahisar.

Following the disastrous deluge that hit Mumbai on July 26, 2005 and claimed 419 lives, the state introduced several measures to prevent such flooding in the future in Mumbai. The Chitale Committee, which was commissioned to find solutions for flooding in Mumbai recommended a series of measures, such as improving Mumbai’s hydrological planning to help the city’s rivers find their way into the sea and prevent them from overflowing into the city and endangering lives during the heavy Mumbai monsoons.  While this exercise mostly called for rejuvenating the rivers, one of the first moves by the authorities involved building retaining…