When governments don’t want strong local bodies or citizen participation

Multiple groups are protesting the manner in which BBMP instituted ward committees in about 2/3rd of the wards – ignoring citizen volunteers and public interest groups, and taking only the input of the corporators. Such protests were bound to happen – and anyone who understands the history of urban failure will see clearly why.

About 40 years after the Republic of India was founded, Parliament decided that the system of Central governments and State governments managing everything was ineffective, and therefore we needed to add three other pieces. To make this happen, they passed two laws – one for rural areas (the 73rd Amendment) and another for urban areas (74th).

(a) The first was regional planning – not by the state government, but by regional councils in different parts of the state.

(b) The second is transfer of more executive powers to local bodies – i.e. municipal councils like BBMP in urban areas, and to panchayats in rural areas.

(c) The third is direct participation by citizens in ward committees – through which they could monitor and direct actions locally.

But the state governments don’t want any of this. As a result, they have dragged their feet for 25 years in implementing this, and even then they have done so only when courts have ordered them to do it.

That’s why BBMP formed the ward committees – in response to a court directive.

Now there are two parts to any law – the letter of the law, and the spirit of the law. The spirit of the 74th Amendment Act, which introduced all this, is that there should be more data-based decision making, and more citizen participation in local matters. In an ideal world, the letter of the laws following the amendment should reflect this spirit. But in practice, the opposite happens.

State governments grandly announce ‘citizen participation’ initiatives in which it is explicitly stated that corporators can veto the citizens. They create new planning councils, but never convene their meetings. They claim to make decisions based on data, though they have never collected this data !! And so on.

Naturally, the people protest. This is neither legal nor fair, they say. And it will harm the city, they say. And they are right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Music, play, and community action help residents protect and celebrate Mumbai’s parks

Citizens are reclaiming their parks with LYPMumbai, an initiative that encourages the better use of open spaces through art and music.

They paved paradise and put up a parking lot/ With a pink hotel, a boutique, and a swinging hot spot. These words of the Joni Mitchell classic Big Yellow Taxi filled a corner of Pushpa Narsee Park in Juhu on a bright Sunday morning in March. Though the song was released in 1970, the words resonate in 2026, especially for this park. There have been several attempts to convert Pushpa Narsee Park into a parking lot, only foiled by the vigilance of the locals, says Anca Florescu Abraham, co-founder of Love Your Parks Mumbai (LYPMumbai). This initiative advocates for the…

Similar Story

Uthandi’s ₹91-crore ‘flood drain’: Is Chennai solving one problem by creating another?

The WRD's flood fix puts Uthandi at risk. Residents flag pollution, CRZ violations, aquifer damage, and threats to nearby fishing livelihoods.

The Straight-cut Flood Escape Channel project at Uthandi in the southern part of Chennai along East Coast Road was conceived by the Water Resources Department (WRD) as a flood mitigation measure, with a budget of ₹91 crores. The plan proposes a cut-and-cover drain through the VGP Layout in Uthandi, to connect the Buckingham Canal to the Bay of Bengal. The drain is supposedly meant to divert excess floodwater in Buckingham Canal during heavy rains, when areas around the Pallikaranai marsh and Okkiyam Madavu face flooding.  Work on the project started immediately after its inauguration in August 2025. However, residents of…