When governments don’t want strong local bodies or citizen participation

Multiple groups are protesting the manner in which BBMP instituted ward committees in about 2/3rd of the wards – ignoring citizen volunteers and public interest groups, and taking only the input of the corporators. Such protests were bound to happen – and anyone who understands the history of urban failure will see clearly why.

About 40 years after the Republic of India was founded, Parliament decided that the system of Central governments and State governments managing everything was ineffective, and therefore we needed to add three other pieces. To make this happen, they passed two laws – one for rural areas (the 73rd Amendment) and another for urban areas (74th).

(a) The first was regional planning – not by the state government, but by regional councils in different parts of the state.

(b) The second is transfer of more executive powers to local bodies – i.e. municipal councils like BBMP in urban areas, and to panchayats in rural areas.

(c) The third is direct participation by citizens in ward committees – through which they could monitor and direct actions locally.

But the state governments don’t want any of this. As a result, they have dragged their feet for 25 years in implementing this, and even then they have done so only when courts have ordered them to do it.

That’s why BBMP formed the ward committees – in response to a court directive.

Now there are two parts to any law – the letter of the law, and the spirit of the law. The spirit of the 74th Amendment Act, which introduced all this, is that there should be more data-based decision making, and more citizen participation in local matters. In an ideal world, the letter of the laws following the amendment should reflect this spirit. But in practice, the opposite happens.

State governments grandly announce ‘citizen participation’ initiatives in which it is explicitly stated that corporators can veto the citizens. They create new planning councils, but never convene their meetings. They claim to make decisions based on data, though they have never collected this data !! And so on.

Naturally, the people protest. This is neither legal nor fair, they say. And it will harm the city, they say. And they are right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Shaping Bengaluru: “Citizens can add real capacity through local knowledge, feedback”

We spoke to authors of the Janaagraha report, ‘Shaping Urban India’ to understand its recommendations in the context of Bengaluru.

“The road is broken, buses are overcrowded, traffic disrupts daily life, garbage piles up on the streets”—these are everyday complaints of citizens across Indian cities. In Bengaluru, these issues only seem to be worsening with passing time. Bengaluru’s built-up area grew by 85.19% between 2001 and 2020, resulting in commuters losing 168 hours (one week) annually to traffic congestion. As the city grows rapidly, governance systems, data frameworks, and citizen participation have failed to keep pace with its increasing complexity. What would it take to bridge this gap?  A report by Janaagraha, a non-profit working to improve the quality of…

Similar Story

India Civic Summit 2026: Spotlight on changemakers transforming cities

From waste management to urban forests, the Indian Civic Summit spotlights residents that are driving change in their cities

Cities are the heart of the Indian growth story. Vibrant. Crowded. Diverse. Multidimensional. And yet, as we look around us, we find that they are ridden with problems and face multiple threats to their ecology, habitats and human lives. The crises in our cities make it hard to imagine an urban future that is truly inclusive, sustainable and marked by high liveability standards. But as the oft-cited quote from anthropologist Margaret Mead goes, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."  That is perhaps the…