Voting is better than blaming the system

The author shares his insights on how to choose right candidates in this election and why one should vote, even when there are no apparent suitable candidates.

"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."
– Theodore Roosevelt

In democracy, vote is the rifle. Vote is the power. Vote is the panacea to ills of the society. Vote is the instrument to bring about the desired changes in one’s surroundings, society and country.

Note: This website will soon be migrated to a new system.  If you face any issues, do mail us. You can also reach us through Twitter or Facebook!

Bengaluru This Week

Get our free weekly newsletter.

The Indian democracy has two challenges.

  1. Making everyone vote.
  2. Voting for the principled and righteous.

We need to delve upon both subjects differently at times and in a semblance sometimes.

If we carefully study the polling patterns and percentiles, it is apparent that the voting percentage is very high (over 75%) in local body elections, medium in the assembly polls (60-65%) and low in Lok Sabha polls (50-55% average).

Unlike earlier years where voters had to walk an extra mile to the booths, today most booths are close-by. Besides, the number of booths has also increased manifold making it ‘no queue or no wait’ booths. There’s also EVM in place of paper booths which makes the process easier. Voters’ slips are also door-delivered by supporters of various parties

Despite these many positives, why voters are not so enthused to vote?

One reason could be the voters’ apathy and allergy towards politicians, who have pulled down the societal standards and values to the point of no-return. Another could be inaction from the voters’ side, with ‘chalega attitude’ and ‘what-difference-my-one-vote-is-going-to-make’ approach.

Let’s not forget. A ballot is like a bullet. We also say in Kannada, ‘ hani hani koodidre halla’ which means ‘every drop makes an ocean’. So, every ballot makes a constituency, every constituency makes a district and a state and a country.

Now, it’s time not to point a finger at someone and the system. It’s time to perform our duty and fulfill our commitment towards the country and the constitution. Let’s shed our lethargy, inaction and passing the buck approach. Let’s exercise our franchise. And most importantly, let’s vote for the principled and service-minded.

Having said that, you need to vote the principled and the righteous, then the question that follows is, how do we identify them? And should one give importance to the candidate or the party.

Answer to both these is here: First, list out all the candidates. Take some time out and study each one of them and assess their pluses and minuses. You should understand that the most important imperative you need to look out in the candidates is the service-mindedness and genuine social concern. Add it to the vision for the constituency and the fighting ability to make that vision for the constituency a reality.

When it comes to the choice between the right party and the right candidate, it is important to give more weight to the right candidate. It is so because, any right party should give ticket only to the right candidate. However good the party’s vision is, its flagbearer at the local level is the candidate. Hence, if a wrong candidate is given the ticket by a good party or the party you adore, ruthlessly you need to reject that party’s candidate.

Another piece of advice. First, the voter should be honest and should not have vested interests or prejudices like caste, language, religion or neighbourhood etc. And also should not get lured with any sort of ‘offerings’ by the candidates.

The formula to select the best candidate in the order of priority is:

  1. Best candidate+best party.
  2. Best candidate irrespective of the party.

In case you find no candidate good, you will have to be more cautious. Assess all of them carefully. And select the lesser evil. Select the one ‘if he doesn’t do good, no problem, at least he should not do anything bad’

Let’s get out of our closets and cast out vote in this election. Thus, let’s bring about the change we wish to see in the system. This is how we can individually and collectively make HAMARA BHARAT MAHAAN.⊕

Comments:

  1. Srinath Agile says:

    Looking at “laughing stock” – collation government(s) and its performance and stability over the past years and the qualities of the candidates who contest for election. I strongly suggest Indian election commission to add one extra button in the electronic ballet machine to show “PRESIDENT RULE” (rather than invalid vote) where Citizens have opportunity to choose president ruled India who can dictate growth and create good future for India and make these corrupt politicians un-employed.

  2. ravi says:

    Is there anything like clean/honest politician? that breed does not exit which world are you living in Mr Manju

    Whom do you vote? our choice between rapist or decoite? or bad from worst??? Sorry to say till we don’t hang the corrupt politician this country has no hope we are doomed. That is why people like Anna Hajare will never reach there goal

  3. BengaluruBudhi says:

    If Voting Changed Anything, They’d Abolish It – Ken Livingstone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…