28% vote in Bengaluru graduates election

More people voted in this election than in 2006. But the voters' woes were the same as in any election. Confusion ruled the day.

Names missing from the voters’ list, confusion over booths allocated – it was deja vu for voters at the Graduate Constituency MLC election on Sunday. Although only 28% i.e. 30,800 off the 1,10,000 people registered showed up, voting was not smooth for many of them. In the previous MLC election, 20,000 voted out of the 70,000 graduates registered.

MLA N A Haris with a voter trying to sort out the latter’s grievance. Pic: Sankar C G

In many places, people faced difficulty in finding out their respective booths, as the website which carries the details of the voters list and polling booths, was slow or not opening.

A voter, who had come to St. Joseph School for voting, was shocked to see his wife’s name missing from the voter’s list. The couple have been voting for many years now. “We don’t really know how these kind of mistakes can happen. It is really a shame on our democracy,” said the citizen, who did not wish to be named.

A Citizen casting his vote. Pic: Sankar C G

Congress MLA, N A Harris, was at the same booth, addressing voters’ concerns. He told Citizen Matters that it is a systemic flaw and this is not the first time they are facing such problems. People are often sent back because of such problems he said.

“Why has the Election Commission not used the services of full time professionals for election work? When(ever) an election approaches, (Election) commission sends notices to Revenue Department, schools and other government offices for hiring employees temporarily for election duties, this must be changed.”

However Chief Electoral Officer, Suranjana C S, defended all allegations and said, “We have done our level best to ensure smooth election process. The voters list draft was submitted by the end of 2011 and was also published for verification. I don’t really know about the flaws in the list. I will take up each case and rectify the problem,” he said.

Suranjana blames Sunday morning lethargy and general lack of interest in voting as the reasons for low voter turn out.

Ramoji Gowda, the Congress candidate however did not think there was any issue with the voters’ list. “Our voters did not have any problem. We have verified voters’ list in advance and worked with voters to avoid these kind of problems.” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Karnataka SIR 2026: Top FAQs and community concerns addressed

As the SIR is underway and voter forms are distributed, much confusion remains about how to fill them. Here are some FAQs to understand the process.

As of July 8, booth level officers (BLOs) have distributed over 4.57 crore enumeration forms for the mandatory Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Karnataka. Yet despite the 82.45% completion rate, the process has faced widespread criticism and been plagued with problems including BLO burnout, and the Kannada-only forms. If you are still figuring out how to fill the enumeration form, read Part 1 of this series. In this part, you can find answers to some common questions on filling the form, online enumeration, progeny mapping, etc. The SIR process poses specific challenges to transgender and queer communities due to changes…

Similar Story

SIR for Karnataka voters: All you need to know about enumeration 

Voter verification requires linking your 2025 rolls to your 2002 records. Here's how you can fill the forms and register.

Karnataka's Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which began on June 30, requires every voter to complete a fresh verification exercise. The SIR is carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to prepare and revise electoral rolls, and ensure its accuracy. The process especially aims to remove deceased voters and duplicate names in the rolls, including those of  citizens who have migrated and are registered as voters in  multiple places. The election commission announced the process with the aim that ‘no eligible citizen is left out and no ineligible citizen is included in the electoral roll’. In the Special Summary…