28% vote in Bengaluru graduates election

More people voted in this election than in 2006. But the voters' woes were the same as in any election. Confusion ruled the day.

Names missing from the voters’ list, confusion over booths allocated – it was deja vu for voters at the Graduate Constituency MLC election on Sunday. Although only 28% i.e. 30,800 off the 1,10,000 people registered showed up, voting was not smooth for many of them. In the previous MLC election, 20,000 voted out of the 70,000 graduates registered.

MLA N A Haris with a voter trying to sort out the latter’s grievance. Pic: Sankar C G

In many places, people faced difficulty in finding out their respective booths, as the website which carries the details of the voters list and polling booths, was slow or not opening.

A voter, who had come to St. Joseph School for voting, was shocked to see his wife’s name missing from the voter’s list. The couple have been voting for many years now. “We don’t really know how these kind of mistakes can happen. It is really a shame on our democracy,” said the citizen, who did not wish to be named.

A Citizen casting his vote. Pic: Sankar C G

Congress MLA, N A Harris, was at the same booth, addressing voters’ concerns. He told Citizen Matters that it is a systemic flaw and this is not the first time they are facing such problems. People are often sent back because of such problems he said.

“Why has the Election Commission not used the services of full time professionals for election work? When(ever) an election approaches, (Election) commission sends notices to Revenue Department, schools and other government offices for hiring employees temporarily for election duties, this must be changed.”

However Chief Electoral Officer, Suranjana C S, defended all allegations and said, “We have done our level best to ensure smooth election process. The voters list draft was submitted by the end of 2011 and was also published for verification. I don’t really know about the flaws in the list. I will take up each case and rectify the problem,” he said.

Suranjana blames Sunday morning lethargy and general lack of interest in voting as the reasons for low voter turn out.

Ramoji Gowda, the Congress candidate however did not think there was any issue with the voters’ list. “Our voters did not have any problem. We have verified voters’ list in advance and worked with voters to avoid these kind of problems.” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…

Similar Story

Bidadi GBIT project: Land acquisition process and compensation raises critical questions

As the goverment focuses on land acquisition for the 7,481-acre project, are farmers' rights and crucial social impact checks being compromised?

The Greater Bengaluru Integrated Township (GBIT) in Bidadi, first notified in March 2025, received its final notification in June 2026 under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act (KUDA Act), 1987. The project is branded as India's first and largest AI City, featuring an AI-integrated township. The project will be implemented by the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA) under the same act. Three villages, Kempainapalya, Vaderahalli, and Mandalahalli are notified in the Gazette under Section 19(1) of the KUDA Act for the implementation of a development scheme, deemed as public purpose. The development scheme is spread over a total of 7,481…