Pollution Board demands bribe; apartment association says no

Pollution Board's attempt to extract Rs 75,000 "fee" from a city apartment turned futile, when residents found that it was in fact a bribe demand.

Around two months back, our apartment association got a notice from the Rajaji Nagar regional office of the state Pollution Control Board (KSPCB). The notice said that we had to pay Rs 1.2 lakh as STP operation fee for six years, starting from January 2007. Ours is a 165-unit apartment in Kundanahalli.

When we went to pay this amount, KSPCB officials said that we had to pay an additional Rs 45,000 (Rs 7,500 annually for the six years) for an environment audit report. This was to be paid to an agency that conducts surveys.

When we enquired about the audit report with estate managers of some similar-sized neighbouring apartments,  they confirmed that the amount had to be paid. So we went back to the office with DD worth 1.2 lakhs and a cheque to the agency for Rs 45,000.

The officials then demanded an additional Rs 30,000 (at Rs 5,000 per year for six years) as bribe and refused to accept the DD if this was not paid. At this stage, I tried to find someone credible who could explain the exact process. I requested online portal ApartmentADDA’s help and got in touch with STP expert Dr Ananth Kodavasal.

• Environment Audit Reports are not required for residential apartments as per a 1992 amendment in the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. Officers demanding this report are just trying to extract money.

• All we need to submit along with the annual fee is a form called Form V, which can be downloaded free from the PCB website. Most fields in the form do not apply to apartments and filling this hardly takes 10 minutes.

• Finally, KSPCB does have powers but officials threatening with "consequences" are just trying to cash in on our fear and cannot do anything without valid reasons.

Dr Kodavasal said that the environment report was not needed and that there was no question of bribe since the forms can be couriered to KSPCB Head Office after making the DD at the Regional Office. (Alternately, both DD and form can be directly submitted at the Head Office.)

So here we were, with Dr. Kodavasal assuring us that Rs. 75,000 was in effect bribe that we need not pay, while on the other hand every estate manager we knew were advising that paying up was the only option.

Meanwhile, our association President and I started getting phone calls threatening us of “dire consequences” like power disconnection, if we did not pay up immediately. We were in a dilemma as we knew that many residents would be upset with us if the threats materialised.

As if that was not enough, the builder too started pressurising us to pay. Finally with Dr Kodavasal’s help we found an honest officer in the Board – Chief Environment Officer M D N Simha – and closed the matter without paying a paise in bribe. But we were indeed surprised that almost every apartment was ignorant on the topic and pays up this “audit fee” and bribe.

Comments:

  1. S Srinivasan says:

    Thanks for the eye opener. BESCOM inspectors also do similar tricks in the name of inspection only to take bribes. I hope the concerned authorities wake up and initiate action to stop this corruption.

  2. S Srinivasan says:

    Thanks for the eye opener. BESCOM inspectors also do similar tricks in the name of inspection only to take bribes. I hope the concerned authorities wake up and initiate action to stop this corruption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Can cool roofs beat Chennai’s heatwaves? A look inside the state’s Green Schools push

Amid heatwaves, the cool roof initiative is being implemented across Chennai schools. But experts warn that it cannot be the single solution for urban heat.

Over the past few years, maths teacher Usha found her classroom sweltering during her usual 12.50–1.50 pm period, on the second floor of Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Government Girls Higher Secondary School. “It was so difficult to take class during the peak hours,” she says. But this year, she mentions that it feels slightly bearable, and attributes this to the shade of the trees, the wind blowing through the building, and the latest addition — solar-reflective paint on the roof. Data from a state government and UNEP Cooling pilot project at the Ambattur school shows that reflective coating brought the classroom’s internal…

Similar Story

The ecological burden: Bidadi township debate highlights growing threat to wildlife movement

The proposed GBIT project could affect elephant habitats between Bengaluru and Ramanagara, worsening human–wildlife conflict.

The proposed GBIT project has generated considerable debate regarding its potential ecological impacts on the Bengaluru–Ramanagara landscape. Two overarching concerns include the loss of highly productive agricultural land, and the transformation of the region's existing natural ecosystems. In particular, the large-scale loss of tree cover and waterbodies has attracted significant public attention. However, another key ecological dimension is wildlife habitats and animal mobility. Unlike agricultural fields or trees, wildlife movement is dynamic and spans diverse landscapes. The area between Bengaluru and Ramanagara is marked by recurring human–wildlife conflicts, particularly human–elephant. Understanding these elephant movements is crucial  for addressing broader ecological…