Pollution Board demands bribe; apartment association says no

Pollution Board's attempt to extract Rs 75,000 "fee" from a city apartment turned futile, when residents found that it was in fact a bribe demand.

Around two months back, our apartment association got a notice from the Rajaji Nagar regional office of the state Pollution Control Board (KSPCB). The notice said that we had to pay Rs 1.2 lakh as STP operation fee for six years, starting from January 2007. Ours is a 165-unit apartment in Kundanahalli.

When we went to pay this amount, KSPCB officials said that we had to pay an additional Rs 45,000 (Rs 7,500 annually for the six years) for an environment audit report. This was to be paid to an agency that conducts surveys.

When we enquired about the audit report with estate managers of some similar-sized neighbouring apartments,  they confirmed that the amount had to be paid. So we went back to the office with DD worth 1.2 lakhs and a cheque to the agency for Rs 45,000.

The officials then demanded an additional Rs 30,000 (at Rs 5,000 per year for six years) as bribe and refused to accept the DD if this was not paid. At this stage, I tried to find someone credible who could explain the exact process. I requested online portal ApartmentADDA’s help and got in touch with STP expert Dr Ananth Kodavasal.

• Environment Audit Reports are not required for residential apartments as per a 1992 amendment in the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. Officers demanding this report are just trying to extract money.

• All we need to submit along with the annual fee is a form called Form V, which can be downloaded free from the PCB website. Most fields in the form do not apply to apartments and filling this hardly takes 10 minutes.

• Finally, KSPCB does have powers but officials threatening with "consequences" are just trying to cash in on our fear and cannot do anything without valid reasons.

Dr Kodavasal said that the environment report was not needed and that there was no question of bribe since the forms can be couriered to KSPCB Head Office after making the DD at the Regional Office. (Alternately, both DD and form can be directly submitted at the Head Office.)

So here we were, with Dr. Kodavasal assuring us that Rs. 75,000 was in effect bribe that we need not pay, while on the other hand every estate manager we knew were advising that paying up was the only option.

Meanwhile, our association President and I started getting phone calls threatening us of “dire consequences” like power disconnection, if we did not pay up immediately. We were in a dilemma as we knew that many residents would be upset with us if the threats materialised.

As if that was not enough, the builder too started pressurising us to pay. Finally with Dr Kodavasal’s help we found an honest officer in the Board – Chief Environment Officer M D N Simha – and closed the matter without paying a paise in bribe. But we were indeed surprised that almost every apartment was ignorant on the topic and pays up this “audit fee” and bribe.

⊕

Comments:

  1. S Srinivasan says:

    Thanks for the eye opener. BESCOM inspectors also do similar tricks in the name of inspection only to take bribes. I hope the concerned authorities wake up and initiate action to stop this corruption.

  2. S Srinivasan says:

    Thanks for the eye opener. BESCOM inspectors also do similar tricks in the name of inspection only to take bribes. I hope the concerned authorities wake up and initiate action to stop this corruption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pallikaranai Marsh’s Zone of Influence: Threat or shield for South Chennai?

Pallikaranai Marsh acts as a buffer against Chennai floods. Protecting homes and ecology around it needs a proper ZoI, not weak rules.

Every monsoon, South Chennai goes underwater. The only sponge that soaks up all that rain is the Pallikaranai Marsh, yet around it, 8,619 hectares of land face severe flood risks. Despite this, the State has offered to protect only a fraction of that land.  On October 9th, the Tamil Nadu State Wetlands Authority (TNSWA) told the Madras High Court  that the marsh's interim Zone of Influence (ZoI) is just 36 survey numbers, covering 128.19 hectares. The next hearing of the case is on November 11th.  Scattered "protection"  These plots lie in bits and pieces across seven villages, from Pallikaranai to Perumbakkam.…

Similar Story

Blocked Kovalam-Nemmeli wetland channels risk disaster for South Chennai; Conservationists urge action  

Barriers built for the Mamallan Reservoir block Buckingham Canal water flow, vital to keep the wetland alive, avoid floods and sustain fishing families.

In Chengalpattu district, the main water channels of the Kovalam-Nemmeli coastal wetland, which drains a catchment of more than 270 square kilometres, have currently been blocked. Barriers that obstruct water flow have been built across Chennai's Buckingham Canal at three places: Thiruvidanthai-Vadanemmeli, near the Nemmeli-Thiruporur bridge, and Saluvankuppam. Earlier, we explored how the Mamallan Reservoir causes serious damage to the wetland’s ecology and how fishing livelihoods are affected. Field investigations by the Wetland Conservation Network have recorded the blockages preventing tidal exchange in the Buckingham Canal.           According to officials, these barriers were put up to enable construction of the Mamallan…