It’s BU against the government, for land

Bangalore University was allotted some land by the government about four decades ago. Two decades later, part of the same land was allotted another party on the sly. BU has been fighting several cases to get the land back.

On October 13th, Bangalore University (BU) demolished a compound wall that was illegally built in its land. This 1 acre land has been with BU for almost four decades, since 1974. But the university has never been able to make use of it. The land is located right along Outer Ring Road. According to BU Registrar B C Mylarappa, the land value is around Rs 15 crores.

Interestingly, this land was not randomly encroached, but was granted to another party by the government itself in 1995. Government granted it to Kanyakumari Vidya Samsthe (KVS), an educational society, at the cost of Rs 16.5 lakhs. In the 1974 order, government had given the land to BU free of cost.

The compound wall being demolished on October 13th. It is located along the Outer Ring Road. Pic: Navya P K

KVS has a school named Kanyakumari High School right behind the one acre land. It had applied for the one acre land for new buildings and a playground, says H Thukkaram, Principal of the school. Thukkaram’s father Hombanna is Secretary of KVS.

BU has been fighting many court cases against state government and KVS, to get the land back. KVS has filed many cases as well. There have been 5-6 petitions and appeals so far. As per the last High Court order, the land belongs to BU itself.

But in a later appeal, HC said that the issue should be settled in civil court. Mylarappa says that BU will soon go to the civil court to get a final decision.

What exactly happened?

The disputed one acre land is part of survey number 32 of Mallathahalli village. Overall, this survey number has 15 acres of land.

Of the 15 acres, 13 was given to BU free of cost, and 2 acres was reserved for building a road. In the 2 acre land, BDA built the Outer Ring Road in ’88. BU’s 13 acres is spread out on either side of the road now. On one side of the road lies the disputed one acre land. On the other side lies the university campus.

In ‘98, BU got the first High Court order favouring it. HC struck down the land grant to KVS. When KVS appealed against this, court again said that the land belonged to BU. But it also said that government could check if any remaining land was available for allotment to KVS.

Based on this, government did a survey and granted the same one acre to KVS again in 2002. BU took the issue to court again. Government justified its decision saying that this one acre land was extra. It said that the road was not built in the reserved two acres, but in BU’s 13 acres. Because of this, the land originally reserved for the road, is still free, government said.

But court said that government’s version was dubious, and that its documents cannot be trusted. BU, on the other hand, brought documents to prove that the road was built in the reserved two acres itself. Court was convinced, and it again ordered that BU owned the land.

1974 – Government grants the land to BU
1995 – Government grants same land to KVS
1998 – HC ordered that land belongs to BU
2002 – Government again granted same land to KVS
2002 – HC quashed this grant, and again favoured BU
2004 – KVS filed appeal; HC asks parties to go to civil court
2011 – BU petitioned Supreme Court for final decision; SC dismissed it without judgement
2012 – BU demolished the compound wall that KVS built, and plans to go to civil court

Citizen Matters has a copy of the initial government grant order to BU. A sketch clearly shows the area marked for BU, and the two acres separately marked for the road.

But KVS did not stop here. It filed another appeal to the HC. This time, court did not express any opinion. It said that only a civil court could investigate the issue. Instead of going to civil court, BU directly approached the Supreme Court. SC suggested mediation between the parties, but BU was not ready for a settlement. Finally SC also dismissed the case without any judgement.

Though there was no decision in the last two cases, the 2002 order was in favour of BU. Hence university continued to own the land.

But around 3-4 months ago, KVS built a compound wall surrounding the one acre land, separating it from the main road. It also built structures such as a library, classroom, and couple of other rooms for commercial purpose.

On October 13th, BU demolished the wall and other structures. Revenue department officials  came to the site and confirmed that the land indeed belonged to BU. Seven days’ notice was given to Hombanna to clear the other structures so that they can be demolished.

Now that the demolition has been done, BU plans to go to civil court to settle the dispute. “Once the civil court case starts, it may stretch indefinitely. Hence the idea to demolish the encroachment now, so that we can start using the land,” says a survey consultant for the university, on condition of anonymity.

Residents want access road through disputed land

Meanwhile, residents nearby have another problem. Their layout – Mallathahalli extension layout – lies beyond the disputed one acre plot. The plot separates their layout from the ring road, hence residents cannot access the road directly.

They say theirs is a BDA layout, and was included under BBMP during its expansion in 2008. Most residents had bought plots here in the 70s and 80s, and had been using a kaccha road across the one acre plot, to access the main road. This kaccha road from the layout to the road, was only 30 feet long.

If they cannot use the kaccha road, the only other option is a roundabout road, which is almost one km long. This road is narrow, and it is difficult for big vehicles to access the area directly.

Now that BU is reclaiming the land, residents are pushing for a public road to be built across the disputed plot. “We may approach the government, requesting it to allot a small part of the plot for a road. It is difficult for us to access the main road during emergencies. Ambulances or big vehicles cannot come in,” says D Sudharshan, a resident.

BU has not been encouraging of residents’ demand. During the demolition, when a resident requested Mylarappa to let them use the plot as thoroughfare, he had refused. Residents are hoping that the government may favour them.


  1. Vaidya R says:

    And what a demolition it was! Huge cement blocks were left strewn on the road causing more pain to already stressed out motorists. Such is life.
    Also, they really need to build a road there. Other access roads are really narrow! One car can’t pass through properly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…

Similar Story

Navigating apartment property legalities: A comprehensive checklist

The third part of the event report on property documentation covers the issues related to Apartment Associations Registration and Laws.

(Citizen Matters, Bengaluru, organised a citizen clinic, 'Decoding property documentation—your guide to sale deeds, khata, EC and more’, where advocate Mithun Gerahalli, who specialises in property law, answered questions regarding property documentation. Part 1 of the three-part event report series covered the legal issues related to property documentation and the due diligence that new buyers should follow. Part 2 dealt with the khata quagmire, Digital Property Ownership Cards (UPOR) and discrepancy between the owner’s claim and the information in the RTC [Record of Rights, Tenancy, and Crops]. Part 3 is about Apartment Associations Registration and Laws) Bengaluru's expansion both horizontally and…