The Avengers could have done better

It is one of the most anticipated movies the year. The first superhero movie of the year that incorporates plenty of action, witty dialogue and destruction.

The Avengers is a bold and unique concept by Marvel, bringing together classic comic superheroes in one big-budget, ambitious project. One of the most anticipated movies the year, and the first superhero movie too, the movie incorporates plenty of action, witty dialogue and destruction. But it could have done better.

It has a pretty straightforward storyline – decidedly wooden Nick Fury (Samuel L Jackson) of S.H.I.E.L.D decides to assemble the earth’s mightiest heroes in order to save the world from an otherworldly attack, led by the Norse god Loki (Tom Hiddleston) who, using a piece of alien tech called the Tesseract, aims to bring in his army and wreak general havoc on planet Earth.

This band of superheroes, including Captain America ( Chris Evans) and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr ) , is forced to cooperate with each other despite their unusual and unprecedented grouping in order to recapture the Tesseract and restore order.

Pic courtesy: Marvel

The movie starts out with a deliberate purpose – to give the audience a sense of who these characters are, what they do and why they do it, which would have made sense if all the characters were not in completely disparate environments and achieving unrelated aims.

This assembly itself takes up the first half of the movie and hardly has any kind of flow. It is amusing, however, to observe the minor ego-battles and verbal jousting that ensues when some of the characters meet – the best one might have been the clash between Captain America’s old school morals and notions of duty versus Tony Stark’s "Genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist" self-assessment.

The second half is all about defending New York and its hapless citizens against the forces of Loki, the trickster god (who does nothing but get captured, sneer evilly and bully a lot of innocent New Yorkers into kneeling before him). There is a lot of mindless violence combined with precision, massacre and assassination, and a lot of destruction that could have been avoided had the characters stopped to think logically. The heroes valiantly take down the intergalactic army that comes from the wormhole opened by the power of the Tesseract, and everything is okay and the world is saved. Hooray.

One thing that’s pretty clear after watching the movie – it’s the characters that pull the story forward, and not the storyline (which barely exists). Credit also goes to the amazing graphics, especially that of the giant flying centipede-things. However, the score fails to make an impact. The characters’ one-liners are funny and sometimes scathing, and the Hulk’s random rage is hilarious – but that’s not all that The Hulk is.

Director Joss Whedon brings out a previously unseen element of Bruce Banner’s character – that of a guy who’s done a lot of bad stuff earlier, and wants to try and make it better. Hawkeye and Black Widow, despite their lack of attention from moviemakers previously, still come out central to the action. But with the kind of backstory they hinted at, it sure looks like they will get their own movie soon. Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is impressive and regal and everything a god should be.

Everyone has their moment in the sun, in such a way that everyone’s moment is equally important. Whedon, you got that part right.

To those who came in hoping to see your favourite action heroes come alive on screen and nothing else, you will be well satisfied. But some, like me, will come back from the movie feeling that a few things were still lacking.

Rating: 3 on 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Safety still out of reach: Everyday struggles of women with disabilities

Women with disabilities face increased risks in public and private spaces because of consent violations, unsafe surroundings and neglect.

Every morning, Samidha Dhumatkar travels from her home in Mumbai’s western suburbs to Churchgate, where she works as a telephone operator at a university campus. Her journey involves taking a rickshaw, boarding a train, and walking to her workplace, similar to thousands of other Mumbaikars who commute daily. However, as a person with a visual disability, Samidha’s commute is fraught with threats to her safety. In their book, Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets, writers Shilpa Phadke, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade, argue that spaces are not neutral. Moreover, they are not designed equally. “Across geography and time,…

Similar Story

India’s stray dog debate puts the nation’s conscience on trial

Street dogs spark a national test — will India choose compassion or fear as law, humanity and coexistence come under strain?

At the heart of a nation’s character lies how it treats its most vulnerable. Today, India finds its soul stretched on a rack, its conscience torn between compassion and conflict, its legal pillars wobbling under the weight of a single, heartbreaking issue: the fate of its street dogs. What began as a Supreme Court suo moto hearing on August 11th has morphed into a national referendum on empathy, duty, and coexistence, exposing a deep, painful schism. Two sides Caregivers and animal lovers: They follow Animal Birth Control (ABC) and Catch-Neuter-Vaccinate-Return (CNVR). Their goal is to reduce dog populations and rabies…