Residents’ concerns imaginary, says BDA

Last month, Koramangala residents got a stay on signal free corridor work. Now BDA has filed its objections in court.

On March 20th, BDA filed its objections in High Court on the Agara-Sirsi Circle signal free corridor PIL. Koramangala 3rd block RWA and others had filed the case last month, specifically asking for work in four Koramangala junctions to be stopped, and HC had ordered a stay on the works. At several places in its objections filing, BDA has gone so far as to say that residents’ concerns are imaginary.

Sarjapur road dug up for construction of grade separator.
File Pic: Deepthi M S

BDA has presented copies of approvals for the project given by Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) of both BBMP and BDA. BDA says that traffic and feasibility studies were implicit in the TAC approvals and the DPRs. BBMP made a DPR for the entire corridor and handed over the project to BDA. After this, BDA made DPRs for the four Koramangala junctions and started work. BDA states this in response to petitioners’ argument that making a DPR for only four junctions is unscientific.

Residents cannot use their ‘private’ traffic survey to find fault with BDA’s ‘scientific’ survey, and the decision to prioritise four junctions is a policy matter, says BDA. BDA has already had many meetings with residents and considered their suggestions; now it is up to BDA to make the final decision, it says.

BDA says that petitioners’ elevated corridor proposal cannot be accepted as there are many junctions along the stretch, and also because it is not financially viable. In the December meeting, Chief Minister had only agreed to look into the project and not stop it. (Residents had said that CM had given verbal assurance to stop the project.)

BDA says it has already considered residents’ proposals and denies that the project would affect road capacity or Koramangala’s residential character. Even if Sarjapur road traffic is caused by congestion in Hosur road and Inner Ring Road, the current design is the only viable solution, it says. BDA also took a jab at residents, saying they also have a personal interest in objecting to the project. Many of them park vehicles on the service road along the junctions, says BDA. Next hearing of the case is on March 28th.

⊕Addendum

In the March 28th hearing, court gave BDA permission to continue works in the four Koramangala junctions. This was based on the work order documents that BDA submitted. Work can continue in these junctions since work orders have already been issued, court said. But this is only an interim order, and hearings on the PIL will continue. Next hearing is on May 29th.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s Road Circulation Plans: Have your say to fix the city’s mobility problems

The GBA and BDA have invited feedback for proposed road plans by Dec 11th. Know more about the proposals and why citizen inputs matter.

The Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) and the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) have released proposed Road Circulation Plans, inviting public suggestions and objections till December 11th, before the final approval. This is a necessary step to address the city’s mobility issues. But before framing the suggestions and objections, citizens need to understand what is meant by a circulation plan and how and why it is prepared. This is critical for Bengaluru, as endless urban expansion without an updated master plan has strained the city’s mobility and transportation systems.  Bengaluru residents can send their feedback to the Office of the Chief Town Planner,…

Similar Story

Out of reach: Chennai’s informal settlements lack safe and accessible bus shelters

MTC is expanding its fleet but an analysis found that 41% of Chennai slum settlements lack nearby bus shelters. Here’s what needs to change.

The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) serves as the backbone of Chennai's urban mobility, carrying millions of residents every day and accounting for over 70% of the city's public transport share. As the transport utility expands its fleet with new buses and renovates shelters across Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) limits, evaluating the accessibility of this mode of public transit becomes important, especially around access points near the city’s informal settlements.  To what extent does the MTC bus shelter network provide accessible and adequate service to slum settlements? And, where should improvements be prioritised? That forms the basis of this study, which…