Builder L&T under the scanner

Competition Commission of India is investigating the company based on a complaint by residents of South City apartment, Puttenahalli.

Since 2002, we – owners of L&T South City apartment – have been waging a long battle against our apartment’s builder L&T and land owner Dinesh Ranka. (Citizen Matters had reported on this here.)

We have been running from pillar to post – going to police stations, holding protest marches, filing cases in City Civil Courts, High Court and Consumer Courts. Now, a complaint filed by our association SUGRUHA (South City Group Housing Apartment Owners’ Association) at the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in August has made an impact.

CCI is a central government body to ensure fair play by businesses and protect consumers’ interests. The Commission gave us a hearing in October. On January 18th, CCI ordered an investigation on the issue. In the order, CCI says that prima facie L&T seems to have violated the Competition Act, 2002.

If found guilty, CCI can order L&T and Ranka to pay penalty. We have demanded penalty of Rs 4500 cr to be levied from L&T, and maximum penalty from Ranka too. The investigation report is expected to be out in March.

South City residents in a protest against L&T last April. Pic: Navya P K

In our complaint, we had pointed out violations committed under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act. These relate to the company’s "abuse of dominant position" and "anti-competitive behavior" to financially exploit us in the garb of providing housing development and management.

The major issues we raised against L&T are:

  • Non-disclosure of the relinquishment of a park and two civic amenity sites to BDA in 1996 and thus selling us property that was no longer owned by them
  • Further illegal relinquishment of land in 2006 to BDA without informed consent from us co-owners
  • Illegal collection of money by granting parking rights on land already sold
  • Violating zoning regulations and fire safety requirements
  • Not returning excess amounts that were charged for power and water bills
  • Malpractices in accounting of maintenance amounts
  • Poor quality of maintenance services
  • Not forming an owners’ association within reasonable time and handing over maintenance, as required by law
  • Non-delivery of promised services and undue delay in project completion

In a landmark order last August, CCI had imposed a penalty of Rs 630 cr on builder DLF for abuse of dominant position. Since many developers in Bangalore are reportedly guilty of similar practices, we hope that this investigation and subsequent actions become a wake-up call for the real estate industry.


  1. A W Xavier says:

    It is really a surprising news though I am not among the affected co-owners. It is necessary CCI evolve a mechanism to audit during project execution itself to ensure similar complaints do not arise.

  2. vswaminathan says:

    Any such course of action, seemingly a fast track one, may not be open in cases where the builder/seller is not a ‘corporate’ and / or is, in comparison, a small fry / more so, if a fly-by-night one.
    The last mentioned two irregularities complained of,namely,-
    Not forming an owners’ association within reasonable time and handing over maintenance, as required by law
    Non-delivery of promised services and undue delay in project completion –
    though, are not uncommon even among those not-so ‘popular'(‘notorious’!) names.
    In today’s scenario, because of largely obtaining irritants e.g. inordinate delays, inconclusive nature of litigation should reliefs be sought through consumer courts, or the like, the aggrieved customer/consumer remains pathetically left in the lurch, gruelingly now than ever before.

  3. Suhas S Nerurkar says:

    Please keep up the good fight.

  4. Viva Furniture says:

    We purchased a flat in MS Garden Apartment, Bangalore from MS ARASU Builders & Developers back in 2012. Few months after the purchase we noticed that the walls had developed cracks due to poor quality of construction and after 1 rain season my room wall was completely ruined due to seepage. I tried contacting the Builder MD of MS Arasu Builders & Developers Mr. B. H. Mahalingappa but they are now not responded to my quires.

    I am now extremely worried that I just lost all my saving money which I had invested towards this Flat and the building might fall due to poor quality of construction.

    MS ARASU Builders & Developer
    No.67-68/51, SUDEV COMPLEX,
    III Floor,S.Kariappa Road,
    Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560004,
    Karnataka, India

    MS Royal is another project which belongs to them and I would strongly suggest that no one buys any apartments from MS Asasu Builders & Developers as you will just end up losing your hard earned money !

    Can someone tell us what we can do ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

What is the ‘smartness’ quotient of Chennai?

The Smart City Advisory Forum was convened in Chennai only 5 times since 2016, showing minimal participation by elected representatives.

Chennai is among the first few cities to get selected under the Smart City Mission programme in 2016. As many as 48 projects under different categories were taken up under the scheme. With only a couple of projects left to be completed, isn't Chennai supposed to look 'smart' now? The much-hyped Central government scheme, launched in 2014, was envisioned to build core infrastructure and evolve 'smart' solutions that would make cities more livable and sustainable. But, a decade since, the reality on the ground may be a little different. While some of the facilities provided under these projects are under-utilised,…

Similar Story

Scenes from a community walk in Mumbai

When I moved to Mumbai, the city felt extremely 'walkable,' but a walking tour in Dadar broadened my definition of walkability.

When I moved to Mumbai in June 2023 for work, I found myself going for sight seeing to the city's tourist destinations. Though the city appeared to have consistent and wide footpaths almost everywhere, vehicular right of way seemed to be prioritised over the pedestrian right of way. This struck me as very strange, even as I continued to enjoy walking through lanes of Mumbai very much. On one hand, there is excellent footpath coverage, utilised by large crowds everywhere. On the other hand, speeding vehicles create obstacles for something as simple as crossing the road.  "Though Mumbai appeared to…