Rajeev Chandrasekhar offers to foot 50% of PIL costs

In a development that has received support from civic champions, Bengaluru's Rajya Sabha MP has offered financial help to citizens fighting public interest litigations.

RWAs and citizens’ groups that fight public causes in court may soon get a helping hand. Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Chandrashekhar (Independent) has offered to bear 50% costs of PILs filed in Bangalore and the state, through the Namma Bengaluru foundation. He first announced this on Twitter.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar was elected to the Rajya Sabha in 2006. Pic: Subramaniam Vincent.

Chandrasekhar’s decision comes on the back of the Karnataka High Court’s verdict three weeks ago on the city’sComprehensive Development Plan (CDP). In a PIL, citizens’ groups had challenged a provision in the current CDP (2005-2015) that allowed commercialisation of residential zones. Court favoured petitioners, ordering that such commercialisation should be stopped.

Chandrashekhar says that the power of PILs is visible now and that judicial intervention may be the only answer to some issues. "I get residents’ requests for help on many issues. Though I advocate these issues with government agencies, that is not enough sometimes, because of vested interests. Hence the decision to support 50% costs of any legitimate PIL," he says.

Citizens who are actively working for reforms, support the move. Vijayan Menon, member of Citizens’ Action Forum (CAF) which was one of the petitioners in the CDP case, says that such support is important and that even a few RWAs accepting financial support will make a difference. RWA members and lawyers can also chip in, he adds.

"RWAs can get funds if all members make a small contribution, but this has not been forthcoming due to indifference. Even with 50% funding, it has to be seen if the other 50% can be mobilised by RWAs. Lawyers can also form a group that accepts PILs at lower rates or pro bono. RWAs or citizens’ groups experienced in researching and filing PILs can also guide bodies that are new to this," says Menon.

N Mukund, member of Citizens Action Forum and Jayanagar 5th block RWA, says that Chandashekhar’s offer is a good opportunity for those who have a genuine cause and need assistance. Brig R S Murthy, former president of Federation of HSR layout RWAs, says that Chandrashekhar’s initiative will motivate RWAs to take up PILs.

There are skeptical voices too. Aditya Sondhi, a Bangalore-based lawyer says that PILs are best funded by petitioners themselves as third party funds can affect the bona fides of the PIL. "This can happen if the sponsor is interested in the PIL for personal, political or publicity reasons; this may not be the case here. But genuine PILs do not need external funding anyway, as discerning lawyers will represent them pro bono or at nominal fee," says Sondhi.

Sondhi is the advocate for the citizens who challenged the government on Bangalore’s CDP. He practices at the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Karnataka.

Chandrasekhar is an entreprenuer-industrialist turned politician. He runs Jupiter Capital, a venture investment firm. He was elected to the Rajya Sabha in 2006, representing Bangalore and Karnataka. He has also been the head of the former chief minister B S Yeddyurappa’s task force for Bengaluru, ABIDe. "Bangaloreans must demand to take their neighbourhoods back", he said in an exclusive interview to Citizen Matters one year ago. 

Chandrashekhar says those looking for support can get in touch with him at feedback@rajeev.in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: The ‘great’ Bengaluru split | Will the Gateway of India jetty get jettisoned?

Here is a lowdown on the Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill and the Maharashtra government's decision to construct a jetty at the Gateway of India in Mumbai.

The GBG Bill: A 'great' idea or just 'greater' trouble? The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 proposes significantly restructuring Bengaluru’s governance by splitting the city into seven corporations and creating a single, unified authority to oversee the city's development. The goal is to streamline decision-making and address Bengaluru’s growing challenges, like traffic and infrastructure issues. But will this really lead to decentralisation? Citizen groups and urban planners argue that the plan gives too much power to the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) and weakens local representation, considering elections to the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike are long pending. When: Tabled in the…

Similar Story

City Buzz: Chennai’s new parking policy | Greens see red over Hyderabad’s Kancha Gachibowli

In a tweaked version of our weekly snippets, we bring you five important things you need to know about some of the pertinent news across the country.

Chennai's parking policy overhauled Are you one of those desperately seeking parking spots in Chennai? Then look out for these five insights from the policy introduced by the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA). Why: The ultimate, though distant, aim of the policy is to streamline parking and reduce driving. With 9.2 million vehicles crowding Chennai’s streets, the government hopes to encourage people to use public transport, ride-sharing, cycling, or walking. This shift is aimed at decongesting roads and enhancing safety and mobility, according to the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) experts, who offered technical knowledge support for…