Sadananda Gowda orders cancellation of copycat ‘La Tomatina’

Public lobbying and social media campaign puts a stop to Bangalore's copy of the La Tomatina festival to have been held at Palace Grounds tomorrow.

Karnataka Chief Minister Sadananda Gowda has ordered the cancellation of Bengaluru’s copycat ‘La Tomatina’ event which was to have been held in Palace Grounds tomorrow.

In the last few days, many have questioned the event which was to involve throwing tomatoes for fun. Akshey Kalra, a young Bangalore resident concerned on the amount of tomatoes that will be wasted during Bengaluru’s La Tomatina festival started a petition and a social media campaign. He also met the District Comissioner (Urban), the Addl Police Commisioner and the Chief Minister’s office to lobby against the event.

The campaign and public outcry seems to have paid off. The CM ordered cancellation of the fest at Bangalore and also at Mysore. "He has directed the Police Commissioners of Bangalore and Mysore to take appropriate steps in this regard", says a release from the CM’s office.

According to the release, representatives of Kolar district tomato growers, environmentalists and few NGOs had met the Chief Minister today and appraised him. The matter has also taken a cultural tone.  “Tomatoes grown by farmers with huge effort is wasted by throwing on each other which represents Western Culture.  In the name of ‘La Tomatina’ fest, tomatoes should not be allowed to go waste”, the release has quoted the farmers as saying to the CM.

B N Vijayakumar, MLA, Jayanagar had led the delegation to the CM, says the release. The arguments were that a minimum of 5,000 people were expected to participate and if 80-100 tomotoes is thrown by each individual, 5 lakh tomatoes, or about 60,000 kgs could be wasted for the entertainment of the affluent. 

Meanwhile, the day saw divergent views on the social media with many opposed to the wastage of food, while some felt a disquiet at the idea of a "ban". Some questioned double standards and the outrage at just a single event.

A citizen questions on Facebook, "If we don’t support wastage of food why do we then allow milk to be used for abhishekams in temples. Thousands of children malnourished…I am against the festival but we should also ask our selves are we wasting food in other ways."

Comments:

  1. Shrinath says:

    Really happy that campaigning paid off…and i am in perfect agreement with the ones saying that we waste a lot of milk doing abhishekams in temples…but that does not mean we should add one more habit of wastage…we already waste a lot, we should put a full stop somewhere, if not try and work on improving the condition.

  2. Gokul Janga says:

    Onion prices have crashed this week, so farmers who can’t afford cold storage am sure will be throwing them out on the streets. I am hoping some genius will come up with a onion throwing festival!. Now, THAT would be fun to watch !!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…