Low turn out at Bangalore’s anti-corruption rally

Though other cities had a higher turn out, in Bangalore fewer people participated in India Against Corruption rally on Sunday.

Bangalore’s ‘India Against Corruption’ (IAC) rally on Sunday was not as much a crowd puller as it was expected to be. While the Saaku rally in December – organised by the same coalition of 18 organisations – had drawn a crowd of about 800, this rally had around 300 citizens from the city.

The Bangalore Indians Against Corruption march on Jan 30th Sunday. Pic: Karthik Raman.

In addition to the coalition, the Art of Living Foundation also participated in organising the rally. The decision about the event was taken impromptu, to coincide with the Delhi rally, where the Jan Lokpal bill was planned to be formally released.

"All organisers got together for their first meeting on January 26. We had only four days to spread the word. This probably was the reason for lower participation. Even though we alerted about two lakh people through mails, there was not much time to co-ordinate the event as much as Saaku," says Srinivas Alavilli, member of Lok Satta, one of the organisers.

Karthik Raman, 27, Associate Researcher at IISc, who participated in the event, came to know about it through social media. "I had not participated in the Saaku campaign, IAC was my first public campaign. There was not much time to inform everyone. But it’s great that people came together; I think such campaigns are necessary."

The campaign saw varying degrees of success in other cities where it was held. "Delhi saw the biggest mass participation. Hyderabad, Mumbai, Pune, etc., had participation in the tune of thousands," says Srinivas.

At the conclusion of the march in Bangalore, several people gave passionate speeches and the central government’s version of the Lokpal Bill was burned. The protesters pointed out that the central government was trying to deceive the public into believing that corruption was being curbed by passing their own version of the Lokpal Bill and not the citizen’s version.⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

PG collapse in Delhi’s Satya Niketan: Who is responsible?

A DU PG collapse exposes the gap between Delhi's planning rules and real building safety. Watch this video to know more.

On September 6, a five-storey boys' Paying Guest (PG) accommodation collapsed in Satya Niketan, near Delhi University's South Campus, leaving seven people dead. This video looks beyond the single building to ask how the neighbourhood reached this point. Delhi has had a formal planning system since the DDA was set up in 1957 and the first Master Plan followed in 1962. Yet Satya Niketan has grown into a dense student housing hub. Officials say the collapsed building had permission for only the ground plus first floors. Ayush Anilal, an architect, studied the area for his thesis. He explains how intensely…

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…