Legally sanctioned apartment in JP Nagar irking residents

Increasing citizen resentment in Bengaluru over permissions being given to illegal constructions is spilling over to legal projects too.

It is a sign of increasing resentment in settled residents over continuing permissions given to townships and commercial complexes in the city’s neighbourhoods. While many recent protests have been against illegal constructions (bye-law violations), one case in JP Nagar has come to light where citizens are protesting the construction of a BDA-sanctioned apartment complex.

Residents in JP Nagar 1st phase are protesting against Sobha Dewflower, an up-and-coming apartment complex located in a plot measuring 31,160 square meters along Sarakki main road. Residents say that once the 231 new apartments in the complex are occupied, the traffic in the already narrow Sarakki road will multiply.

The wall-to-wall width of Sarakki road is only 9.5 metres and the road already has heavy traffic. Heavy Motor Vehicles (HMVs) have already been banned in the road as per a government order, say residents. Parking is also not allowed on the road because of congestion.

‘Shobha’s dewflower apartment is located along the narrow Sarakki road. Pic: Navya P K.

Dewflower comprises super-luxury flats that cost Rs 1.8 – 3.4 crores. "The buyers of these flats are likely to have more than one vehicle. BBMP should have done a traffic assessment management study before giving sanction to the builder," says B R Udupa, Secretary of the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) of JP Nagar 1st phase.

Udupa also claims that the builder has violated building bye-laws. Sobha, clarified to Citizen Matters that the sanction was obtained from BDA (Bangalore Development Authority) as per provisions for ‘residential development plans’ (housing projects on plot areas greater than 20,000 sq metres) in the CDP (Comprehensive Development Plan – 2015). "The complex is being constructed as per all rules and there have been no violations. The sanction was obtained after considering that such construction along such a road is permissible under bye-laws," says R Raman, Head of Corporate Communications at Sobha Developers.

Citizen Matters has verified that Sobha’s Dewflower project comes under Chapter 7.1 of the CDP and as per this, the builder is allowed to have a project of this scale with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.0 on a road less than 12 meters wide. On the face of it, there appears to be no zoning violation.

Narayan Gowda, Joint Director of Town Planning at BDA, also confirmed that the project was not illegal. "Such constructions may cause traffic congestion, but the rules do allow it. Unless any policy decisions are made on this, the rules apply," he said.

[Click on image to enlarge]. Chapter 7 of CDP allows development plans to be constructed in roads less than 12 m wide

However, Mayor S K Natraj had responded to the situation saying that the road would be widened to reduce congestion. But the road is not part of the list of roads that have been identified for widening as per the RMP (Revised Master Plan). Sheshadri Iyer, a resident in the area, says that around 200 buildings will be affected if the road is widened.

Though the road is not on the current list of 23 roads being widened, the Mayor’s statement has had its effect. The RWA is now planning to organise a signature campaign. "Residents are worried. We plan to submit a request to the Mayor with signatures of 1000 residents. Either the sanction given to the complex should be withdrawn or the builder should build an approach road to some other public road and close the current exit way that leads to Sarakki road," says Udupa.

Sobha for its part is holding its own since the group has a valid plan sanction. The developer is hence proceeding with the project.


  1. C N Kumar says:

    It is clear that a large piece of land with a single narrow road laccess has not been integrated with the surrounding developments. Had it been acquired by BDA and then developed such a large piece of land would have several roads providing access to it. One may have to find out why the land was not acquired by BDA to understand the full import of the issue.

    The National Building Code also requires a minimum 12 meter access road for the ingress and egress of fire and other emergency service vehicles in case of a disaster.

    As rightly pointed out by Shri Udupa a traffic impact study should have been done before the development plan was sanctioned.

    Planning authorities are expected to apply their minds instead of mechanically permitting such developments.
    There are two classic examples of Malls on Sampige Road and Hosur Road where there are huge traffic problems everyday day caused by a mechanical interpretation of rules without an iota of foresight!

  2. Dr Y. Nagarajan says:

    There are hardly any good roads connecting areas Jayanagar (and northwards) to Kanakapura Road/ JP Nagar 24th Main. Three decades ago a plan to extend RV Road further south was shot down. With traffic already having increased by leaps and bounds, residents of Sarakki Main Road are having a miserable time and with the upcoming project it can only get worse. BDA or BBMP or town planners have to make an alternate road themselves or direct the builder to do so. Widening the road by forcibly acquiring the properties of people who have stayed on this road for years is not the solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

What is the ‘smartness’ quotient of Chennai?

The Smart City Advisory Forum was convened in Chennai only 5 times since 2016, showing minimal participation by elected representatives.

Chennai is among the first few cities to get selected under the Smart City Mission programme in 2016. As many as 48 projects under different categories were taken up under the scheme. With only a couple of projects left to be completed, isn't Chennai supposed to look 'smart' now? The much-hyped Central government scheme, launched in 2014, was envisioned to build core infrastructure and evolve 'smart' solutions that would make cities more livable and sustainable. But, a decade since, the reality on the ground may be a little different. While some of the facilities provided under these projects are under-utilised,…

Similar Story

Scenes from a community walk in Mumbai

When I moved to Mumbai, the city felt extremely 'walkable,' but a walking tour in Dadar broadened my definition of walkability.

When I moved to Mumbai in June 2023 for work, I found myself going for sight seeing to the city's tourist destinations. Though the city appeared to have consistent and wide footpaths almost everywhere, vehicular right of way seemed to be prioritised over the pedestrian right of way. This struck me as very strange, even as I continued to enjoy walking through lanes of Mumbai very much. On one hand, there is excellent footpath coverage, utilised by large crowds everywhere. On the other hand, speeding vehicles create obstacles for something as simple as crossing the road.  "Though Mumbai appeared to…