Borewell drillers’ tragic death leaves unanswered questions

One month after the shocking death of a borewell worker, no one in BBMP or BWSSB seems to be in position to give a clear picture of what went wrong.

As a response to water shortage, four bore wells were sanctioned under the councillors quota for every ward. Unfortunately in BTM layout, the program resulted in two tragic deaths, on 16th Main Road, in II Stage.

borewell work results in death

On June 15th, one of the crew members of the borewell firm that got the contract, took the first step to raise the bore motor to start drilling. While raising it, the equipment touched the electricity line above. Power was not shut down in these lines leading to the operator’s death within a fraction of a second. One co-worker tried to save him but even he got electrocuted. He died while he was on the way to hospital. The firm’s name, as reported by the DNA is Renuka Borewells, based in Nelamangala, near Peenya.

One month after the tragedy, no one in the administration – BBMP, Corporator G N R Babu, or BWSSB officials – seems to be in position to give a clear picture of what went wrong and whether the borewell firm itself was at fault. There is also no information on whether any compensation or damages were given to anyone.

BESCOM BTM Layout’s Assistant Engineer Ewesharappa says that he received no prior intimation about the work from BBMP or any other agency.

Oddly enough, the firm ‘Renuka Borewells’ is not traceable. The firm’s phone numbers don’t seem valid. The firm is also not listed in major online phone directories or in BSNLs’ landline directory for Nelamangala.

Initially, BTM Layout corporator G N R Babu told Citizen Matters that the BWSSB had given Rs 2 lakh per head to the contractor. However Babu could not confirm this and his assistant Gururaj said this was only a rumour.

There is no confirmed word that the BBMP has given any compensation or has received such a request. Citizen Matters talked to Narayana Gowda, an engineer with the BBMP’s borewell project. Gowda was aware of the accident, but did not throw any more light on it. “I don’t know any thing about the compensation, it is contractors responsibility to take care if some thing has happened”, says Gowda.

Mallikarjun, Assistant Works Engineer with BTM Layout’s BWSSB, was not reachable for any comments. Babu however says the project will continue next week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Public gatherings in Tamil Nadu: SOPs must be followed in full spirit for safety

New SOPs in Tamil Nadu mandate safety measures at mass events, placing responsibility on organisers to protect participants.

In a country like ours, where mass gatherings of various kinds are an integral part of life, we keep hearing of stampedes invariably leading to casualties, every now and then. Last year saw two such events, which made national headlines and shook the nation, one a sports victory parade gone sour in Bengaluru and the other, a stampede at a political road show in Karur, Tamil Nadu. The year before, Chennai witnessed huge crowds at an IAF show on the Marina Beach, which led to five deaths and more than a hundred hospitalisations due to heat-related issues and chaos arising…

Similar Story

The good news: Bengaluru’s unified transport vision. The bad: BMLTA rules auto-approve Tunnel Road

The proposed rules for the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority let major projects like the Tunnel Road through without a formal review.

The Karnataka government has notified the draft Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) rules — over three years after the BMLTA Act came into being — and has invited suggestions/objections by February 2nd, 2026.   The BMLTA was meant to be a unified transport body to regulate, monitor, develop and plan urban mobility in Bengaluru. The government had failed to constitute the Authority within the statutory timeline of six months. Now, the much-delayed draft rules propose to strip away all forms of transparency and accountability! One controversial clause (Rule 24) proposes to grant deemed approval to projects initiated between 2022…