Why ruin, then restore?

We in Bangalore are at the beginning of the 'ruin-then-restore' cycle. We can either learn from those (like Seoul) who have gone ahead of us down this path and changed course recently, or go down the same path.

In 1978, as the city of Seoul in South Korea ‘developed’, a 6 km. long river called the Cheonggyecheon was covered up. An 8-lane street was built over it, and an elevated expressway built over the street. The road was called Cheonggye Road, in memory of the late river.

In 2005 the elevated expressway and the road were broken up and the river restored. It took two  years and the equivalent of Rs. 4000 crore for the restoration.

Cheonggyecheon river

2002 : Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon river in its avatar as a road. Pic source: G V Dasarathi.

Cheonggyecheon river

2005 : Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon river after its restoration. Pic source: G V Dasarathi.

Most developing countries go down the route of adding concrete, tar, steel and plastic to their landscape at a breakneck pace as they become prosperous. Development is somehow confused with raping the environment. South Korea too was one such developing country, and fell prey to this developing country syndrome. It is now part of the first world, and is redefining the term ‘development.trees being cut, Bengaluru

Trees being destroyed to make way for vehicles in Bangalore. Pic source: G V Dasarathi.

In Namma Bengaluru, we are now engaged in the task of recklessly building elevated roads and flyovers,  widening roads, chopping down trees and filling up lakes, all in the name of improving infrastructure

We do not have rivers, but we have covered up a lot of lakes in our greed for land. Majestic bus stand used to be Dharmambudhi Tank, Kanteerava Stadium was Sampangi Tank, City Market was Siddikatte tank, the Football Stadium was Shoolay Tank.

Many of today’s localities were once tanks – Channammanakere Achkattu, Leggere, Abbigere, Konanakunte, Mathikere, Kargunte, Sarakki kere, Tavarekere, Agasanakere, Mavalli. Kere means lake in Kannada, and all localities with names ending with ‘kere’ or ‘gere’ were once lakes, some of them man-made, some natural. In fact it is mostly these areas than get water-logged in the monsoon. How logical is it to live in the middle of a former lake (which is the lowest point in the area, into which water naturally flows from the surrounding space) and then complain when water enters our house during heavy rains? But then, that’s another story.

The damage that we are doing to the city is mostly irreversible, or reversible at an astronomical cost, like the Rs. 700 crore per km. of the Cheonggyecheon river.

The government is worried about businesses moving out of Bangalore, and talks of making the city once again the preferred destination for businesses from all over the world. Most companies that came here in the past did so because of its climate, clean air, greenery, culture and history. We are now destroying the very reason that brought all those companies to Bangalore in the first place. Why would they come to just another hot dusty concrete jungle, when they can go to cheaper ones like Faridabad, Kanpur or any of the hundreds of such towns in India ?

We in Bangalore are at the beginning of the ‘ruin-then-restore’ cycle. We can either learn from those (like Seoul) who have gone ahead of us down this path and changed course recently, or go down the same path and learn from our own bitter and costly experience.

Given our confidence in our ‘glorious 4000 year old cultural heritage and history of scientific achievements’, something tells me that we will not want to learn from the experiences of other countries and will want to chart our own path. So (pardon my cynicism) I think we can brace ourselves for some serious concreting, asphalting, tree-cutting, lake-filling and Bangalore-warming for the next 20 years. ⊕

 

Comments:

  1. Poornima Dasharathi says:

    Nehru loved coming out of the City Railway Station to face the big Dharmambudhi Tank & considered Bangalore as the ‘City of the Future’. Is it now a thing of past?

  2. Jagadish S says:

    Good article – strong on facts and low on emotions(as I have come to expect from Dasarathi).
    But I guess realization sometimes comes only from a crisis. If there is none we create one!

    Jaga

  3. BN Gundu Rao says:

    The example of south korian city is welcome. Bangalore, as a small town from 1890, primarily Mavalli area is known to me when I was a small boy. The Bangalore contonment area was developed by Britishers.To set rihgt the present conditions, The Government could, if it is serious,may set up a ‘think tank’. Indian brains are in no way inferior to the others in this world. What is needed is a didicated and firm approach to solve the problem. Is it possible by the corrupt state government,where self interest is predominent than the honest well being of Bangalore? Who will bell the cat?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Opinion: Why climate action must recognise and include India’s informal workers

As COP29 discusses ways to mitigate the climate crisis, India must address the adversities faced by informal workers and chalk out plans.

The ongoing COP29 conference in Baku, is a pivotal moment in climate action, focusing on global cooperation to limit warming to 1.5°C. Key priorities include mobilising financial resources for developing countries to submit ambitious climate plans (NDCs) by 2025 and continuing support through the Fund for Loss and Damage (FRLD) established at COP28. COP29 also aims to strengthen adaptation efforts by setting finance-backed targets for the Global Goal on Adaptation.  While COP29 primarily focuses on international climate initiatives, India must address pressing domestic issues. One key group often overlooked is informal workers in Indian cities. Over 80% of India’s urban…

Similar Story

Status check: Key concerns remain as Chennai moves ahead with WTE plans

Greater Chennai Corporation's tender for the Waste-To-Energy plant is at the final stage; Here is what we know about the bidders

17,422 metric tonnes per day — that's the staggering amount of trash the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) will generate in 30 years. Currently, Chennai produces 6,143 metric tonnes of waste daily, which adds to the growing piles in Kodungaiyur and Perungudi dump yards. Like many other major cities, GCC is struggling to find a sustainable solution for waste management and has proposed a Waste-To-Energy (WTE) plant. However, the experiences of cities like Delhi are testimony to the significant environmental and health impacts of WTE plants. A recent The New York Times investigative report on the Delhi WTE reveals: "The government…