Sustainable Bengaluru is a pipe dream until rest of Karnataka develops

Bangalore’s struggles are not due to lack of expertise or new ideas. We’ve tried those, with only limited success. What is needed instead is faith in the right institutions and processes, and realising that until the rest of Karnataka develops, it will be next to impossible to restore and maintain the capital alone at high levels of livability.

It is the prerogative of every new government to appoint its advisors, but in doing so, it must take care that the statutory bodies which have the mandate to guide development are not bypassed or diluted. Indeed, if those same advisors were inducted into the statutory institutions, a powerful new direction of governance will emerge.

There is a Metropolitan Planning Committee for the city region, but this has not functioned at all in the past. There is also a State Planning Board, of which the less said the better. These are statutory bodies, which means that they are the right institutions in which we should try to gather the expertise needed, if at all we focus on expertise as the starting point.

BATF and ABIDe, both from the pre-MPC era, had limited programmatic successes, but the momentum from each did not outlive the governments that created them, partly because the push to institutionalise good planning through the Metropolitan Region Governance Bill failed. The Vision Group of the previous government was a non-starter. All for roughly the same reason – the failure to build capacity in statutory institutions.

I call upon the community of experts who have worked closely with different governments in the state to insist that the MPC is the right institution through which their expertise should be taken on board by the government.

Equally, without a regional development strategy for the state, properly led by the Planning Board, every idea we encounter for Bengaluru will be overwhelmed by immigration. Making the different regions of the state independently strong as economic centers is a pre-requisite for the development of Bengaluru, and the sooner we get down that road the better.


  1. Amith says:

    How does the new demand for a separate state in North Karnataka fit into the overall scheme of things?

    The North has cheap labour, availability of water and power is not an issue but its management is. Most of Hyderabad Karnataka is arid and rich in mineral wealth. It is time to get investors to these locations in North Karnataka and build capabilities in both discrete and process based manufacturing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

We’re paying the price for digging holes around the ground we stand on

For years together, people talked about the 'demographic dividend'. Thanks to high fertility ratios in the past, a large number of young people would be entering the workforce, and we as yet don't have a very large aged population, so the ratio of workers to non-workers would be favourable. It would boost economic activity and taxes, and allow us to make investments in many public goods and services. This was not a bad picture to paint. But it had one important assumption - namely, that the young people entering the workforce would be skilled and productive. But we totally missed…

Similar Story

Of plumbers, slumber and economic development

If there's a leak in the water line in your building, you'll call the plumber. You won't call the carpenter and hope that by a combination of luck, brute force, learning-on-the-job, prayer, etc. he'll somehow get the job done. But when it comes to governance, we don't use this basic filter. We put the wrong people in charge of problem solving, and endlessly debate why they should be nonetheless able to solve them. They can't. The sooner we admit it the better. Structure matters. The internal capacity of organisations makes a difference. Being alert to larger trends and learning from…